Effective converting ratio when switching between Ona-botulinumtoxin-A and Abo-botulinumtoxin-A in cervical dystonia. A patient assessment cross over study

Ninel Nazarian
{"title":"Effective converting ratio when switching between Ona-botulinumtoxin-A and Abo-botulinumtoxin-A in cervical dystonia. A patient assessment cross over study","authors":"Ninel Nazarian","doi":"10.19080/oajnn.2019.12.555832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Purpose: Due to ongoing debate and lack of data, the aim of this study was to determine an effective conversion ratio between Ona-botulinum toxin-A / Abo-botulinum toxin-A therapy. Methods: This study includes patients with cervical dystonia who obtained a satisfying improvement to Ona-botulinum toxin-A and respectively Abo-botulinumtoxin-A injections. The patient´s satisfaction of the procedure was measured as effect on a VAS-score (0-100%). Data was usable in our study when each patient reached a satisfying improvement of minimum 90% after toxin treatment. Toxins were injected in the same muscles, using the same technique every 3rd month. EMG was used to measure the dystonic activity in the muscles in the cervical region. The average conversion ratio of Ona-botulinum toxin-A/Abo-botulinum toxin-A was estimated when stable optimal treatment doses were found (VAS-score outcome of 90%). Results: 48 patients with cervical dystonia had a treatment time of 15,75±4,58 years. We sampled 2546 injection series. Doses were 126 ± 38,77 U for Ona-botulinumtoxin-A and 381,6 ± 151,1 U for Abo-botulinumtoxin-A. The VAS-score was found to be between 90-100% either using Ona or Abo-botulinum toxin-A. Conclusion: A conversion ratio of 1: 2,56 was safe and satisfying when changing treatment between Ona-botulinumtoxin-A to Abo-botulinumtoxin-A.","PeriodicalId":317103,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Journal of Neurology & Neurosurgery","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Journal of Neurology & Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19080/oajnn.2019.12.555832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Due to ongoing debate and lack of data, the aim of this study was to determine an effective conversion ratio between Ona-botulinum toxin-A / Abo-botulinum toxin-A therapy. Methods: This study includes patients with cervical dystonia who obtained a satisfying improvement to Ona-botulinum toxin-A and respectively Abo-botulinumtoxin-A injections. The patient´s satisfaction of the procedure was measured as effect on a VAS-score (0-100%). Data was usable in our study when each patient reached a satisfying improvement of minimum 90% after toxin treatment. Toxins were injected in the same muscles, using the same technique every 3rd month. EMG was used to measure the dystonic activity in the muscles in the cervical region. The average conversion ratio of Ona-botulinum toxin-A/Abo-botulinum toxin-A was estimated when stable optimal treatment doses were found (VAS-score outcome of 90%). Results: 48 patients with cervical dystonia had a treatment time of 15,75±4,58 years. We sampled 2546 injection series. Doses were 126 ± 38,77 U for Ona-botulinumtoxin-A and 381,6 ± 151,1 U for Abo-botulinumtoxin-A. The VAS-score was found to be between 90-100% either using Ona or Abo-botulinum toxin-A. Conclusion: A conversion ratio of 1: 2,56 was safe and satisfying when changing treatment between Ona-botulinumtoxin-A to Abo-botulinumtoxin-A.
ona -肉毒杆菌毒素- a与abo -肉毒杆菌毒素- a在宫颈肌张力障碍中的有效转换比率。病人评估交叉研究
背景和目的:由于持续的争论和缺乏数据,本研究的目的是确定ona -肉毒毒素- a / abo -肉毒毒素- a治疗之间的有效转化率。方法:本研究包括分别注射ona -肉毒杆菌毒素a和abo -肉毒杆菌毒素a获得满意改善的宫颈肌张力障碍患者。患者对手术的满意度通过vas评分(0-100%)来衡量。当每个患者在毒素治疗后达到至少90%的满意改善时,数据可用于我们的研究。每3个月用同样的方法在相同的肌肉中注射毒素。肌电图用于测量颈部肌肉张力障碍活动。当找到稳定的最佳治疗剂量时,估计ona -肉毒杆菌毒素a / abo -肉毒杆菌毒素a的平均转化率(vas评分结果为90%)。结果:48例颈肌张力障碍患者治疗时间为15.75±4.58年。我们取样2546注射剂系列。毒株-肉毒杆菌毒素a的剂量为126±38.77 U, abo -肉毒杆菌毒素a的剂量为386.1±151.1 U。使用Ona或abo -肉毒毒素a, vas评分在90-100%之间。结论:ona -肉毒杆菌毒素A转换为abo -肉毒杆菌毒素A的转化率为1:2:56,是安全且令人满意的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信