Tumble stability criterion of integrated locomotion and manipulation

K. Yoneda, S. Hirose
{"title":"Tumble stability criterion of integrated locomotion and manipulation","authors":"K. Yoneda, S. Hirose","doi":"10.1109/IROS.1996.571067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We discuss methods to evaluate the stability of robots which execute manipulations and locomotion. The relationship between the center of gravity projection point and the ground contact points is an easy-to-use criterion but it does not take into consideration manipulation counter-force. We propose a concept called \"tumble stability\", which considers the tumble direction when all ground contact points except 2 are hypothetically lost. If a given, hypothetically lost, ground contact point can produce support force which can suppress that tumble, the walking machine will not tumble; otherwise, it will. Stability during manipulations can be evaluated by incorporating the manipulation counter-force as an external force in this evaluation standard. The stability of the planned manipulation can be determined not only on level ground, but on general topography including rugged terrain, wall surfaces and ceiling surfaces. We introduce the concept of the manipulation counter-force limit as an index to indicate manipulation capabilities. Because this indicates the limit value of the counter-force by which a manipulation can be stably executed, it clarifies the fact that it is effective to make the ground contact points on the side opposite from the manipulation farther and wider in order to heighten manipulation performance.","PeriodicalId":374871,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IROS '96","volume":"46 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"60","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IROS '96","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.1996.571067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 60

Abstract

We discuss methods to evaluate the stability of robots which execute manipulations and locomotion. The relationship between the center of gravity projection point and the ground contact points is an easy-to-use criterion but it does not take into consideration manipulation counter-force. We propose a concept called "tumble stability", which considers the tumble direction when all ground contact points except 2 are hypothetically lost. If a given, hypothetically lost, ground contact point can produce support force which can suppress that tumble, the walking machine will not tumble; otherwise, it will. Stability during manipulations can be evaluated by incorporating the manipulation counter-force as an external force in this evaluation standard. The stability of the planned manipulation can be determined not only on level ground, but on general topography including rugged terrain, wall surfaces and ceiling surfaces. We introduce the concept of the manipulation counter-force limit as an index to indicate manipulation capabilities. Because this indicates the limit value of the counter-force by which a manipulation can be stably executed, it clarifies the fact that it is effective to make the ground contact points on the side opposite from the manipulation farther and wider in order to heighten manipulation performance.
运动与操纵结合的翻滚稳定性判据
讨论了机器人在进行操作和运动时的稳定性评价方法。重心投影点与地面接触点之间的关系是一个易于使用的判据,但它没有考虑操作反力。我们提出了一个叫做“翻滚稳定性”的概念,它考虑了除了2个地面接触点之外所有地面接触点都假设失去时的翻滚方向。如果一个给定的,假设失去的地面接触点能够产生支撑力来抑制翻滚,行走机器就不会翻滚;否则,它会。操作过程中的稳定性可通过将操作反作用力作为本评价标准中的外力来评价。计划操作的稳定性不仅可以在平地上确定,而且可以在一般地形上确定,包括崎岖地形,墙壁表面和天花板表面。我们引入了操纵反力极限的概念作为指示操纵能力的指标。因为这表明了一个操作可以稳定执行的反力的极限值,它澄清了这样一个事实,即为了提高操作性能,将与操作相反的一侧的地面接触点设置得更远更宽是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信