Parallel implementations of the False Nearest Neighbors method for distributed memory architectures

I. M. Carrión, E. A. Antúnez, M. M. A. Castillo, J. M. Canals
{"title":"Parallel implementations of the False Nearest Neighbors method for distributed memory architectures","authors":"I. M. Carrión, E. A. Antúnez, M. M. A. Castillo, J. M. Canals","doi":"10.1002/cpe.1588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The False Nearest Neighbors (FNN) method is particularly relevant in several fields of science and engineering (medicine, economics, oceanography, biological systems, etc.). In some of these applications, it is important to give results within a reasonable time scale; hence, the execution time of the FNN method has to be reduced. This paper describes two parallel implementations of the FNN method for distributed memory architectures. A ‘Single-Program, Multiple Data’ (SPMD) paradigm is employed using a simple data decomposition approach where each processor runs the same program but acts on a different subset of the data. The computationally intensive part of the method lies mainly in the neighbor search and therefore this task is parallelized and executed using 2 to 64 processors. The accuracy and the performance of the two parallel approaches are then assessed and compared with the best sequential implementation of the FNN method, which appears in the TISEAN project. The results indicate that the two parallel approaches, when the method is run using 64 processors on a SGI Origin 3800, are between 40 and 80 times faster than the sequential one. The efficiency is between 65 and 125%. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":214565,"journal":{"name":"Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp.","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.1588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The False Nearest Neighbors (FNN) method is particularly relevant in several fields of science and engineering (medicine, economics, oceanography, biological systems, etc.). In some of these applications, it is important to give results within a reasonable time scale; hence, the execution time of the FNN method has to be reduced. This paper describes two parallel implementations of the FNN method for distributed memory architectures. A ‘Single-Program, Multiple Data’ (SPMD) paradigm is employed using a simple data decomposition approach where each processor runs the same program but acts on a different subset of the data. The computationally intensive part of the method lies mainly in the neighbor search and therefore this task is parallelized and executed using 2 to 64 processors. The accuracy and the performance of the two parallel approaches are then assessed and compared with the best sequential implementation of the FNN method, which appears in the TISEAN project. The results indicate that the two parallel approaches, when the method is run using 64 processors on a SGI Origin 3800, are between 40 and 80 times faster than the sequential one. The efficiency is between 65 and 125%. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
分布式内存体系结构中伪最近邻方法的并行实现
假最近邻(FNN)方法在科学和工程的几个领域(医学、经济学、海洋学、生物系统等)特别相关。在其中一些应用中,在合理的时间范围内给出结果是很重要的;因此,必须减少FNN方法的执行时间。本文描述了分布式存储体系结构中FNN方法的两种并行实现。“单程序,多数据”(SPMD)范例使用一种简单的数据分解方法,其中每个处理器运行相同的程序,但作用于不同的数据子集。该方法的计算密集型部分主要在于邻居搜索,因此该任务并行化并使用2到64个处理器执行。然后评估了两种并行方法的精度和性能,并与TISEAN项目中出现的FNN方法的最佳顺序实现进行了比较。结果表明,当该方法在SGI Origin 3800上使用64个处理器运行时,两种并行方法的速度比顺序方法快40到80倍。效率在65%到125%之间。版权所有©2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信