Diversity

K. Lippert‐Rasmussen
{"title":"Diversity","authors":"K. Lippert‐Rasmussen","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190648787.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter discusses diversity-based justifications of affirmative action. It offers different accounts of the scope of diversity and different accounts of what diversity consists of. The overall conclusion of the chapter is that while, in some contexts, considerations about diversity speak in favor of specific affirmative action policies, most benefits from diversity are not tied to specifically boosting the representation of excluded groups. Moreover, in some scenarios increasing diversity will actually speak in favor of reducing the representation of an excluded, but large, minority. Finally, the chapter draws a distinction between critiques of proponents of the diversity argument who appeal to a concern for diversity in an opportunistic way and critiques of that argument as such.","PeriodicalId":365406,"journal":{"name":"Making Sense of Affirmative Action","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Making Sense of Affirmative Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190648787.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter discusses diversity-based justifications of affirmative action. It offers different accounts of the scope of diversity and different accounts of what diversity consists of. The overall conclusion of the chapter is that while, in some contexts, considerations about diversity speak in favor of specific affirmative action policies, most benefits from diversity are not tied to specifically boosting the representation of excluded groups. Moreover, in some scenarios increasing diversity will actually speak in favor of reducing the representation of an excluded, but large, minority. Finally, the chapter draws a distinction between critiques of proponents of the diversity argument who appeal to a concern for diversity in an opportunistic way and critiques of that argument as such.
多样性
本章讨论了平权行动基于多样性的理由。它对多样性的范围和多样性的组成提供了不同的解释。本章的总体结论是,虽然在某些情况下,对多样性的考虑有利于具体的平权行动政策,但多样性的大多数好处与具体提高被排斥群体的代表性无关。此外,在某些情况下,增加多样性实际上会有利于减少一个被排斥但人数众多的少数群体的代表。最后,本章区分了对多样性论点支持者的批评,他们以机会主义的方式呼吁对多样性的关注,以及对这种论点的批评。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信