The Death of the Desk Crit

Malini Srivastava, J. Barton, M. Christenson
{"title":"The Death of the Desk Crit","authors":"Malini Srivastava, J. Barton, M. Christenson","doi":"10.35483/acsa.teach.2019.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes three alternative architectural studio teaching models taught by the authors at the University of Minnesota and at Stanford University. The three models attempt to build independent and collaborative capacity in students and to emphasize iterative components of the design process. Collectively, the models reflect the authors’ shared conviction that studio education is quite pliable and available to a wide variety of changes in approach and methods.The three models discussed in this paper are the Harkness model, the Exchanges in the Thick Middle and Shifting Allegiances. The Harkness model was implemented and tested in early undergraduate studios at Stanford University. Exchanges in the Thick Middle and the Shifting Allegiances studios, studio pedagogy based in play frameworks of “movement, change, alternation, succession, association and separations” (Srivastava and Christenson 2018), have been tested at the University of Minnesota and North Dakota State University in both undergraduate and graduate studios. All three models are briefly introduced in this paper, followed by a description of the typical day and a typical review in the studios. The conclusions section briefly outlines the overlaps and differences in the three models.","PeriodicalId":216118,"journal":{"name":"Practice of Teaching | Teaching of Practice: The Teacher’s Hunch","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practice of Teaching | Teaching of Practice: The Teacher’s Hunch","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35483/acsa.teach.2019.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper describes three alternative architectural studio teaching models taught by the authors at the University of Minnesota and at Stanford University. The three models attempt to build independent and collaborative capacity in students and to emphasize iterative components of the design process. Collectively, the models reflect the authors’ shared conviction that studio education is quite pliable and available to a wide variety of changes in approach and methods.The three models discussed in this paper are the Harkness model, the Exchanges in the Thick Middle and Shifting Allegiances. The Harkness model was implemented and tested in early undergraduate studios at Stanford University. Exchanges in the Thick Middle and the Shifting Allegiances studios, studio pedagogy based in play frameworks of “movement, change, alternation, succession, association and separations” (Srivastava and Christenson 2018), have been tested at the University of Minnesota and North Dakota State University in both undergraduate and graduate studios. All three models are briefly introduced in this paper, followed by a description of the typical day and a typical review in the studios. The conclusions section briefly outlines the overlaps and differences in the three models.
办公桌暴击的消亡
本文描述了作者在明尼苏达大学和斯坦福大学教授的三种不同的建筑工作室教学模式。这三种模式试图在学生中建立独立和协作的能力,并强调设计过程中的迭代组件。总的来说,这些模型反映了作者的共同信念,即工作室教育是非常柔韧的,可以在方法和方法上进行各种各样的变化。本文讨论了哈克尼斯模型、厚中间交换模型和忠诚转移模型。哈克尼斯模型在斯坦福大学早期的本科生工作室中得到了实施和测试。厚中间的交流和转移忠诚工作室,工作室教学法基于“运动,变化,交替,继承,联系和分离”的游戏框架(Srivastava和christensen 2018),已经在明尼苏达大学和北达科他州立大学的本科生和研究生工作室进行了测试。本文简要介绍了这三种模式,然后描述了典型的一天,并在工作室进行了典型的回顾。结论部分简要概述了三种模型的重叠和差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信