Easy or Difficult! MOOC difficulty and retention

Vivek Sabanwar, Avijit Pandey, Rathin Biswas, K. Arya
{"title":"Easy or Difficult! MOOC difficulty and retention","authors":"Vivek Sabanwar, Avijit Pandey, Rathin Biswas, K. Arya","doi":"10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"MOOCs are experiencing high enrolment statistics and academics are focusing on ways to improve the retention rates in MOOCs. e-Yantra imparts hands-on engineering skills in a highly scalable manner to undergraduate students in engineering, polytechnic and science colleges. The e-Yantra MOOC takes form of a Robotics Competition where students are mentored to solve problems modelled as “Themes.” We study the effect of “difficulty levels” on participant retention of two Themes (hands-on MOOCs). The performance of 800+ students that participated in each of these MOOCs (1600+ total students) offered in 2017 and 2018 is considered. In the light of increasing popularity of online learning especially through MOOCs, this study contributes to the literature of “funnel of participation” in MOOCs teaching conceptually difficult engineering topics in a hands-on Project Based Learning mode. Our study brings contrast with the general comprehension from prior literature that shows MOOCs teaching easier concepts to have high completion rates and MOOCs teaching difficult concepts to have low completion rates. We find simplicity and coherence of MOOC design, regardless of difficulty level of MOOC to have a stronger effect on learning outcomes. Conceptually difficult MOOC in our study has “2.75” times higher completion rate compared to the easier MOOC. This affirms that it is better to teach solving “one challenging problem” than to teach solving a series of easy problems since the latter leads to “conceptual clutter” among participants and as a result a fatigue and consequential increased dropouts.","PeriodicalId":416694,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

MOOCs are experiencing high enrolment statistics and academics are focusing on ways to improve the retention rates in MOOCs. e-Yantra imparts hands-on engineering skills in a highly scalable manner to undergraduate students in engineering, polytechnic and science colleges. The e-Yantra MOOC takes form of a Robotics Competition where students are mentored to solve problems modelled as “Themes.” We study the effect of “difficulty levels” on participant retention of two Themes (hands-on MOOCs). The performance of 800+ students that participated in each of these MOOCs (1600+ total students) offered in 2017 and 2018 is considered. In the light of increasing popularity of online learning especially through MOOCs, this study contributes to the literature of “funnel of participation” in MOOCs teaching conceptually difficult engineering topics in a hands-on Project Based Learning mode. Our study brings contrast with the general comprehension from prior literature that shows MOOCs teaching easier concepts to have high completion rates and MOOCs teaching difficult concepts to have low completion rates. We find simplicity and coherence of MOOC design, regardless of difficulty level of MOOC to have a stronger effect on learning outcomes. Conceptually difficult MOOC in our study has “2.75” times higher completion rate compared to the easier MOOC. This affirms that it is better to teach solving “one challenging problem” than to teach solving a series of easy problems since the latter leads to “conceptual clutter” among participants and as a result a fatigue and consequential increased dropouts.
简单还是困难!MOOC的难度和留存率
mooc的入学率很高,学者们正致力于提高mooc的保留率。e-Yantra以高度可扩展的方式向工程,理工和科学学院的本科生传授动手工程技能。e-Yantra MOOC采用机器人竞赛的形式,指导学生解决建模为“主题”的问题。我们研究了“难度等级”对两个主题(实践mooc)参与者留存率的影响。在2017年和2018年提供的mooc中,参加每个mooc的800多名学生(1600多名学生)的表现被考虑在内。鉴于在线学习(尤其是通过mooc进行的在线学习)日益普及,本研究为mooc以实践项目为基础的学习模式教授概念上困难的工程主题的“参与漏斗”的文献做出了贡献。我们的研究与以往文献的普遍理解形成了对比,即MOOCs教授简单概念的完成率高,而MOOCs教授难概念的完成率低。我们发现,无论MOOC的难度高低,简单和连贯的MOOC设计对学习效果的影响都更大。在我们的研究中,概念困难的MOOC的完成率是简单的MOOC的2.75倍。这肯定了,教学生解决“一个具有挑战性的问题”比教他们解决一系列简单的问题要好,因为后者会导致参与者的“概念混乱”,结果是疲劳和随之而来的辍学率上升。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信