The End of Life Choice Act: a proposed implementation and research agenda.

Jessica Young, J. Winters, J. Snelling, B. White, C. Gavaghan, A. Geddis, R. Egan
{"title":"The End of Life Choice Act: a proposed implementation and research agenda.","authors":"Jessica Young, J. Winters, J. Snelling, B. White, C. Gavaghan, A. Geddis, R. Egan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3969548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM\nThis article outlines the End of Life Choice Act 2019. It highlights some of the key implementation issues to ensure the system operates safely and equitably after the Act comes into force. It also identifies priorities for research to ensure issues are detected and provision of assisted dying (AD) is monitored.\n\n\nMETHOD\nWe reviewed the End of Life Choice Act, assisted dying implementation literature and governmental reports.\n\n\nRESULTS\nEffective system implementation depends on infrastructure, oversight and funding. In terms of service provision, we make recommendations about training for all health practitioners and providing practitioners; the nuances of discussing the \"wish to hasten death\"; conscientious objection; cultural safety for Māori; and minimising the complexity of delivering assisted dying practice. Structured research is needed to understand how the assisted dying system is operating.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThis article contributes by identifying core issues for practitioners, patients and policymakers. Implementation is an ongoing process that continues after the Act starts. Data are required to know whether access is equitable, who is choosing to make use of the law, whether providers are well informed and whether the safeguards are working as intended. The implications of how the Act is implemented are significant for patients, whānau, health professionals and society.","PeriodicalId":160836,"journal":{"name":"The New Zealand medical journal","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The New Zealand medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3969548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

AIM This article outlines the End of Life Choice Act 2019. It highlights some of the key implementation issues to ensure the system operates safely and equitably after the Act comes into force. It also identifies priorities for research to ensure issues are detected and provision of assisted dying (AD) is monitored. METHOD We reviewed the End of Life Choice Act, assisted dying implementation literature and governmental reports. RESULTS Effective system implementation depends on infrastructure, oversight and funding. In terms of service provision, we make recommendations about training for all health practitioners and providing practitioners; the nuances of discussing the "wish to hasten death"; conscientious objection; cultural safety for Māori; and minimising the complexity of delivering assisted dying practice. Structured research is needed to understand how the assisted dying system is operating. CONCLUSION This article contributes by identifying core issues for practitioners, patients and policymakers. Implementation is an ongoing process that continues after the Act starts. Data are required to know whether access is equitable, who is choosing to make use of the law, whether providers are well informed and whether the safeguards are working as intended. The implications of how the Act is implemented are significant for patients, whānau, health professionals and society.
生命终结选择法案:一项拟议的实施和研究议程。
本文概述了2019年生命终止选择法案。它强调了一些关键的实施问题,以确保该系统在法案生效后安全、公平地运行。它还确定了研究的重点,以确保发现问题并监测辅助死亡的提供。方法回顾《终止生命选择法》、协助死亡实施的相关文献和政府报告。结果有效的系统实施取决于基础设施、监督和资金。在提供服务方面,我们就所有卫生从业人员的培训和提供从业人员提出建议;讨论“加速死亡的愿望”的细微差别;良心;文化安全为Māori;以及将辅助死亡实践的复杂性降到最低。需要结构化的研究来了解辅助死亡系统是如何运作的。结论本文为医生、患者和政策制定者确定了核心问题。实施是一个持续的过程,在该法生效后继续进行。需要数据来了解获取是否公平,谁在选择利用法律,提供者是否知情,以及保障措施是否按预期发挥作用。该法案的实施对患者、whānau、卫生专业人员和社会都有重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书