Working group report on process [production process workflow in cooperative virtual enterprises]

P. Ciancarini, V. Jagannathan, M. Klein, Wil M.P. van der Aalst
{"title":"Working group report on process [production process workflow in cooperative virtual enterprises]","authors":"P. Ciancarini, V. Jagannathan, M. Klein, Wil M.P. van der Aalst","doi":"10.1109/ENABL.1995.484543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The process workgroup was given the task of studying the production process workflow in cooperative (virtual) enterprises, such as large software houses or companies needing concurrent engineering methods, e.g., for designing and making industrial products. We initiated our agenda by studying the main requirements of tools and environments which could entitle them to support production processes. In our vision, the main tools for supporting process design are descriptive notations for process modeling. Such notations should be formal, to help in understanding, analysing, and simulating the process models we describe. Our requirements for the environment were more vague: we envision an environment distributed on heterogeneous hardware, with a rich infrastructure of services, like distributed object databases and hypertext browsers like the WWW. More important, the environment should be able to \"understand\" the process model to be supported and enacted, i.e., it should be able to reconfigure itself, possibly dynamically, to support and enforce (\"enact\") the workflow defined by the process model. The agenda we discussed included a survey of existing tools and notations for process modeling, which we summarize, an overview of research trends in the recent past, is outlined and, finally, a study of interesting scenarios and case studies worthy of being explored in the near future is discussed.","PeriodicalId":275450,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 4th IEEE Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WET ICE '95)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 4th IEEE Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WET ICE '95)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ENABL.1995.484543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The process workgroup was given the task of studying the production process workflow in cooperative (virtual) enterprises, such as large software houses or companies needing concurrent engineering methods, e.g., for designing and making industrial products. We initiated our agenda by studying the main requirements of tools and environments which could entitle them to support production processes. In our vision, the main tools for supporting process design are descriptive notations for process modeling. Such notations should be formal, to help in understanding, analysing, and simulating the process models we describe. Our requirements for the environment were more vague: we envision an environment distributed on heterogeneous hardware, with a rich infrastructure of services, like distributed object databases and hypertext browsers like the WWW. More important, the environment should be able to "understand" the process model to be supported and enacted, i.e., it should be able to reconfigure itself, possibly dynamically, to support and enforce ("enact") the workflow defined by the process model. The agenda we discussed included a survey of existing tools and notations for process modeling, which we summarize, an overview of research trends in the recent past, is outlined and, finally, a study of interesting scenarios and case studies worthy of being explored in the near future is discussed.
流程工作组报告[协同虚拟企业生产流程工作流]
过程工作组的任务是研究协作(虚拟)企业的生产过程工作流,例如大型软件公司或需要并行工程方法的公司,例如用于设计和制造工业产品。我们通过研究工具和环境的主要要求来启动我们的议程,这些要求可以使它们支持生产过程。在我们的设想中,支持流程设计的主要工具是用于流程建模的描述性符号。这样的符号应该是形式化的,以帮助理解、分析和模拟我们所描述的流程模型。我们对环境的要求更加模糊:我们设想一个分布在异构硬件上的环境,具有丰富的服务基础设施,如分布式对象数据库和超文本浏览器(如WWW)。更重要的是,环境应该能够“理解”要支持和制定的流程模型,也就是说,它应该能够重新配置自身(可能是动态的),以支持和实施(“制定”)流程模型定义的工作流。我们讨论的议程包括对流程建模的现有工具和符号的调查,我们总结了这些工具和符号,概述了最近的研究趋势,最后讨论了值得在不久的将来探索的有趣场景和案例研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信