ANALISIS YURIDIS (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 264K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2015) TERHADAP PENGHAPUSAN PENDAFTARAN MEREK AKIBAT MEREK TIDAK DIPERGUNAKAN DALAM KEGIATAN PERDAGANGAN

Ketut Pastika Jaya, Ketut Sudiatmaka, Ni Ketut Sari Adnyani
{"title":"ANALISIS YURIDIS (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 264K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2015) TERHADAP PENGHAPUSAN PENDAFTARAN MEREK AKIBAT MEREK TIDAK DIPERGUNAKAN DALAM KEGIATAN PERDAGANGAN","authors":"Ketut Pastika Jaya, Ketut Sudiatmaka, Ni Ketut Sari Adnyani","doi":"10.23887/glr.v2i2.208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nThis study was conducted in order to know and understand about the cancellation of the brands carried in trading activities in accordance with Act No. 20 of 2016 on the brand and geographical indications. This study is the method of normative research using qualitative descriptive type of approach, the conceptual approach and the approach of the legislation. And then analyzed using the primary legal materials, secondary and tertiary to obtain relevant conclusions to the problems faced. The results showed that the appeal filed by INTER IKEA Systems BV was rejected on the grounds of Law No. 15 of 2001 on the brand, the brand set to be deleted from the list of generic brand if not used for 3 (three) years in a row. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":399663,"journal":{"name":"Ganesha Law Review","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ganesha Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23887/glr.v2i2.208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was conducted in order to know and understand about the cancellation of the brands carried in trading activities in accordance with Act No. 20 of 2016 on the brand and geographical indications. This study is the method of normative research using qualitative descriptive type of approach, the conceptual approach and the approach of the legislation. And then analyzed using the primary legal materials, secondary and tertiary to obtain relevant conclusions to the problems faced. The results showed that the appeal filed by INTER IKEA Systems BV was rejected on the grounds of Law No. 15 of 2001 on the brand, the brand set to be deleted from the list of generic brand if not used for 3 (three) years in a row.
司法分析(最高法院裁决第264K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2015年的一项研究)反对因为该品牌没有在商业活动中使用而取消注册
根据2016年第20号关于品牌和地理标志的法案,进行这项研究是为了了解和理解在贸易活动中进行的品牌取消。本文的研究方法是采用定性描述型方法、概念型方法和立法型方法进行规范研究。然后利用一级法律资料、二级法律资料和三级法律资料进行分析,得出所面临问题的相关结论。结果显示,INTER IKEA Systems BV提出的上诉被驳回,理由是2001年关于该品牌的第15号法律,如果连续3(3)年未使用,该品牌将从通用品牌名单中删除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信