Review of National Legislations Applicable to Seabed Mineral Resources Exploitation

Saul Roux, C. Horsfield
{"title":"Review of National Legislations Applicable to Seabed Mineral Resources Exploitation","authors":"Saul Roux, C. Horsfield","doi":"10.1163/9789004391567_015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In parallel to growing interest for seabed exploration and mining in the high seas, there has been increased interest for seabed mining activities within the national jurisdictions of coastal states. Seabed mining in the high seas and within national jurisdictions is not unconnected. Seabed mining in the high seas provides a good indication of the nature, status quo and future of seabed mining in national jurisdictions and vice versa. Notably, the direction of seabed mining in the high seas will influence the policy directions of nation states.1 This chapter seeks to provide a broad overview of seabed mining within the national jurisdictions of sovereign coastal states. Section 2 provides a brief outline of international legal and governance instruments that are intended to provide a framework for national policy and decision-making on seabed mining. Section 3 seeks to provide a comparative analysis of legal and policy approaches adopted by various countries in relation to seabed exploration and exploitation. This aims to offer insights into legal principles and mechanisms that have been used in response to seabed mining. This comparative analysis focuses on seabed mining, in respect of both exploration and exploitation, within the exclusive economic zones of five coastal states namely: New Zealand, Australia, Namibia, Mexico and Papua New Guinea. These cases are assessed primarily due to the fact that seabed mining proposals have been concentrated in these coastal states. Furthermore, they represent a diversity of policy approaches and regulatory regimes. These approaches have been diverse, due","PeriodicalId":131018,"journal":{"name":"The Law of the Seabed","volume":"156 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Law of the Seabed","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004391567_015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In parallel to growing interest for seabed exploration and mining in the high seas, there has been increased interest for seabed mining activities within the national jurisdictions of coastal states. Seabed mining in the high seas and within national jurisdictions is not unconnected. Seabed mining in the high seas provides a good indication of the nature, status quo and future of seabed mining in national jurisdictions and vice versa. Notably, the direction of seabed mining in the high seas will influence the policy directions of nation states.1 This chapter seeks to provide a broad overview of seabed mining within the national jurisdictions of sovereign coastal states. Section 2 provides a brief outline of international legal and governance instruments that are intended to provide a framework for national policy and decision-making on seabed mining. Section 3 seeks to provide a comparative analysis of legal and policy approaches adopted by various countries in relation to seabed exploration and exploitation. This aims to offer insights into legal principles and mechanisms that have been used in response to seabed mining. This comparative analysis focuses on seabed mining, in respect of both exploration and exploitation, within the exclusive economic zones of five coastal states namely: New Zealand, Australia, Namibia, Mexico and Papua New Guinea. These cases are assessed primarily due to the fact that seabed mining proposals have been concentrated in these coastal states. Furthermore, they represent a diversity of policy approaches and regulatory regimes. These approaches have been diverse, due
审查适用于海底矿产资源开发的国家立法
在对公海海底勘探和采矿日益感兴趣的同时,对沿海国国家管辖范围内的海底采矿活动也日益感兴趣。公海和国家管辖范围内的海底采矿并非没有联系。公海海底采矿很好地说明了国家管辖范围内海底采矿的性质、现状和未来,反之亦然。值得注意的是,公海海底采矿的方向将影响民族国家的政策方向本章力图对主权沿海国国家管辖范围内的海底采矿提供一个广泛的概述。第2节简要概述了旨在为海底采矿的国家政策和决策提供框架的国际法律和治理文书。第3节试图对各国在海底勘探和开发方面所采取的法律和政策办法进行比较分析。其目的是提供对用于应对海底采矿的法律原则和机制的见解。这项比较分析的重点是在五个沿海国家即新西兰、澳大利亚、纳米比亚、墨西哥和巴布亚新几内亚的专属经济区内进行勘探和开采的海底采矿。对这些案例进行评估的主要原因是海底采矿建议集中在这些沿海国家。此外,它们代表了政策方法和管理制度的多样性。由于这些方法是多种多样的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信