Comparison of Laser-Ceramic and Laser-Metal Material Processing

G. Deng, M. Gordon, L. Roe, A. Malshe, W. F. Schmidt
{"title":"Comparison of Laser-Ceramic and Laser-Metal Material Processing","authors":"G. Deng, M. Gordon, L. Roe, A. Malshe, W. F. Schmidt","doi":"10.1115/imece2000-1553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In an effort to better understand and thereby utilize laser processing, an existing code describing laser-metal (aluminum) interaction is modified to describe laser-ceramic (diamond) interaction. Comparisons between our modified code (diamond target) and the original code (aluminum target) highlight similarities and differences between laser-ceramic and laser-metal processing. Gas breakdown effects, which are expected for the simulated short (time duration), high energy laser pulses, are observed in both codes. Due to the lower sublimation heat of aluminum (1.1×104J/g) compared to diamond (5.3×104J/g), aluminum vaporizes more quickly and exhibits a faster expansion speed (1.4×107 cm/sec compared to 8×106 cm/sec for diamond) in the early stage of the laser pulse. Because aluminum requires significantly more energy to fully ionize than does carbon, our simulations show that the diamond plasma is fully ionized (6 of 6 electrons per atom) and the aluminum plasma is partially ionized (11 of 13 electrons per atom).","PeriodicalId":221080,"journal":{"name":"Heat Transfer: Volume 5","volume":"173 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heat Transfer: Volume 5","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2000-1553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In an effort to better understand and thereby utilize laser processing, an existing code describing laser-metal (aluminum) interaction is modified to describe laser-ceramic (diamond) interaction. Comparisons between our modified code (diamond target) and the original code (aluminum target) highlight similarities and differences between laser-ceramic and laser-metal processing. Gas breakdown effects, which are expected for the simulated short (time duration), high energy laser pulses, are observed in both codes. Due to the lower sublimation heat of aluminum (1.1×104J/g) compared to diamond (5.3×104J/g), aluminum vaporizes more quickly and exhibits a faster expansion speed (1.4×107 cm/sec compared to 8×106 cm/sec for diamond) in the early stage of the laser pulse. Because aluminum requires significantly more energy to fully ionize than does carbon, our simulations show that the diamond plasma is fully ionized (6 of 6 electrons per atom) and the aluminum plasma is partially ionized (11 of 13 electrons per atom).
激光陶瓷与激光金属材料加工的比较
为了更好地理解并因此利用激光加工,对描述激光-金属(铝)相互作用的现有代码进行了修改,以描述激光-陶瓷(金刚石)相互作用。将修改后的代码(金刚石靶)与原始代码(铝靶)进行比较,突出了激光陶瓷加工与激光金属加工之间的异同。在两种编码中都观察到气体击穿效应,这种效应在模拟的短(时间持续)高能激光脉冲中是预期的。由于铝的升华热(1.1×104J/g)低于金刚石(5.3×104J/g),因此在激光脉冲的早期,铝的蒸发速度更快,膨胀速度也更快(1.4×107 cm/秒,金刚石为8×106 cm/秒)。因为铝比碳需要更多的能量才能完全电离,我们的模拟表明,金刚石等离子体完全电离(每个原子6个电子中的6个),铝等离子体部分电离(每个原子13个电子中的11个)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信