Disclosure Of Final Stadium Patients' Diagnosis Review From Law And Bioethics In Indonesia

Arsyzilma Hakiim, F. Wiryani
{"title":"Disclosure Of Final Stadium Patients' Diagnosis Review From Law And Bioethics In Indonesia","authors":"Arsyzilma Hakiim, F. Wiryani","doi":"10.22219/aclj.v3i3.22195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relationship between doctor-patient rights and obligations, especially in hospitals, cannot be separated from conflicts or disagreements. These conflicts usually occur in special conditions that cause dilemmas in decision-making by doctors. Disclosure of the truth of the diagnosis in terminal patients or those suffering from end-stage disease is an ethical and legal issue that often occurs in health services. Problems occur, where on the one hand if the doctor tells the truth (reveals the truth) regarding the diagnosis/disease and on the other hand the doctor is worried that revealing the truth will have an impact that can worsen the patient's condition such as making the patient more depressed so that the patient can refuse further treatment. . But on the other hand, patients have the right to know information related to their illness. This research was conducted with a normative review approach. The results of this study found that disclosure of the truth about the end-stage disease can cause disturbances in psychological aspects and can potentially affect the patient's quality of life. The legal approach in disclosing the truth of end-stage disease through Law Number 36 of 2009 concerning health, Law Number 44 of 2009 concerning hospitals, and Law Number 29 of 2004 concerning medical practice is not fully the basis for the implementation of doctors in conveying the truth. Therefore, the bioethical aspect approach in this case through the principles of non-maleficence and respect for autonomy, truth disclosure can be done ethically and can minimize the negative impact of truth disclosure.","PeriodicalId":250069,"journal":{"name":"Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ)","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v3i3.22195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relationship between doctor-patient rights and obligations, especially in hospitals, cannot be separated from conflicts or disagreements. These conflicts usually occur in special conditions that cause dilemmas in decision-making by doctors. Disclosure of the truth of the diagnosis in terminal patients or those suffering from end-stage disease is an ethical and legal issue that often occurs in health services. Problems occur, where on the one hand if the doctor tells the truth (reveals the truth) regarding the diagnosis/disease and on the other hand the doctor is worried that revealing the truth will have an impact that can worsen the patient's condition such as making the patient more depressed so that the patient can refuse further treatment. . But on the other hand, patients have the right to know information related to their illness. This research was conducted with a normative review approach. The results of this study found that disclosure of the truth about the end-stage disease can cause disturbances in psychological aspects and can potentially affect the patient's quality of life. The legal approach in disclosing the truth of end-stage disease through Law Number 36 of 2009 concerning health, Law Number 44 of 2009 concerning hospitals, and Law Number 29 of 2004 concerning medical practice is not fully the basis for the implementation of doctors in conveying the truth. Therefore, the bioethical aspect approach in this case through the principles of non-maleficence and respect for autonomy, truth disclosure can be done ethically and can minimize the negative impact of truth disclosure.
从印尼法律与生命伦理学的角度披露终场病人的诊断审查
医患权利和义务之间的关系,特别是在医院中,不能脱离冲突或分歧。这些冲突通常发生在特殊情况下,导致医生在决策时陷入困境。披露终末期病人或终末期疾病患者的诊断真相是卫生服务中经常出现的一个伦理和法律问题。问题发生了,一方面,如果医生告诉真相(揭示真相)关于诊断/疾病,另一方面,医生担心透露真相会产生影响,可能会恶化患者的病情,如使患者更加沮丧,从而患者可以拒绝进一步治疗。但另一方面,患者有权知道与他们的疾病有关的信息。本研究采用规范的回顾方法进行。本研究结果发现,披露终末期疾病的真相会引起心理方面的干扰,并可能影响患者的生活质量。通过关于健康的2009年第36号法、关于医院的2009年第44号法和关于医疗实践的2004年第29号法披露终末期疾病真相的法律途径,并不能完全成为医生履行传达真相的基础。因此,本案例中的生命伦理方法通过非恶意和尊重自主权的原则,可以道德地进行真相披露,并可以最大限度地减少真相披露的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信