{"title":"American Indians and Alaska Natives","authors":"R. T. Goins, Collette Adamsen","doi":"10.4135/9781412963848.n10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a searing testimony, in June 2010, to the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, 19-year-old Alaska Native student Mariah Bowers described how the No Child Left Behind Act had let her down and left far too many Indian students behind. A conscientious student who had perfect attendance and always did her homework, Mariah struggled in school. Because of the pressures of NCLB, \" my teachers were more concerned with teaching to the tests and getting through all the curriculum than making sure we actually understood the material, \" Mariah told the Committee. By her freshman year of high school, Mariah was skipping classes, getting into trouble with other truant students, and on the verge of dropping out of school. If she hadn't transferred to a tribally operated public school that uses Native language and culture to teach all subjects , Mariah, now a college sophomore, might have been a statistic rather than a success story. The evidence is clear: NCLB, unveiled to great fanfare almost a decade ago, has done more harm than good to American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) students—making it absolutely imperative, say Indian leaders, that next time around, we get the nation's most important education law right. As Congress prepares to reauthorize NCLB, Indian leaders have presented comprehensive recommendations for the education of AI/AN students (see sidebar), whose performance has stagnated under NCLB due to narrowed curricula, the loss of Native language and cultural programs, and inappropriate use of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), particularly in Indian communities with high student mobility. losing ground with nClB Recent reports show that American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) students have some of the highest dropout rates in the country and that Native children are the only students to show no significant progress in math and science scores since 2005 (AI/AN 8th graders had a slight increase in reading scores). In addition, American Indians and Alaska Natives are more likely than any other racial or ethnic group to be targeted for special education services, while suspension and expulsion rates for Native students are second only to those for African Americans. Given the circumstances, the loss of native curricula is particularly damaging, say AI/AN educators, for students who are already isolated from their culture. The vast majority of Indian students attend public schools that are off-reservation, with highly diverse student bodies and a limited number of Native educators. As a result, …","PeriodicalId":118221,"journal":{"name":"Handbook of Rural Aging","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handbook of Rural Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963848.n10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Abstract
In a searing testimony, in June 2010, to the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, 19-year-old Alaska Native student Mariah Bowers described how the No Child Left Behind Act had let her down and left far too many Indian students behind. A conscientious student who had perfect attendance and always did her homework, Mariah struggled in school. Because of the pressures of NCLB, " my teachers were more concerned with teaching to the tests and getting through all the curriculum than making sure we actually understood the material, " Mariah told the Committee. By her freshman year of high school, Mariah was skipping classes, getting into trouble with other truant students, and on the verge of dropping out of school. If she hadn't transferred to a tribally operated public school that uses Native language and culture to teach all subjects , Mariah, now a college sophomore, might have been a statistic rather than a success story. The evidence is clear: NCLB, unveiled to great fanfare almost a decade ago, has done more harm than good to American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) students—making it absolutely imperative, say Indian leaders, that next time around, we get the nation's most important education law right. As Congress prepares to reauthorize NCLB, Indian leaders have presented comprehensive recommendations for the education of AI/AN students (see sidebar), whose performance has stagnated under NCLB due to narrowed curricula, the loss of Native language and cultural programs, and inappropriate use of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), particularly in Indian communities with high student mobility. losing ground with nClB Recent reports show that American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) students have some of the highest dropout rates in the country and that Native children are the only students to show no significant progress in math and science scores since 2005 (AI/AN 8th graders had a slight increase in reading scores). In addition, American Indians and Alaska Natives are more likely than any other racial or ethnic group to be targeted for special education services, while suspension and expulsion rates for Native students are second only to those for African Americans. Given the circumstances, the loss of native curricula is particularly damaging, say AI/AN educators, for students who are already isolated from their culture. The vast majority of Indian students attend public schools that are off-reservation, with highly diverse student bodies and a limited number of Native educators. As a result, …
2010年6月,19岁的阿拉斯加土著学生玛丽亚·鲍尔斯(Mariah Bowers)在参议院印第安事务委员会(Senate Committee on Indian Affairs)发表了一份激烈的证词,描述了《不让一个孩子掉队法》(No Child Left Behind Act)是如何让她失望的,它让太多的印第安学生落在了后面。玛丽亚是一个认真的学生,出勤率很高,总是做作业,在学校里很挣扎。由于NCLB法案的压力,“我的老师更关心的是应试教学和完成所有课程,而不是确保我们真正理解这些材料,”玛丽亚告诉委员会。到高一的时候,玛利亚就开始逃课,和其他逃学的学生闹得不可收拾,甚至濒临辍学的边缘。如果她没有转到一所使用土著语言和文化教授所有课程的部落经营的公立学校,玛丽亚现在是大学二年级的学生,她可能只是一个统计数据,而不是一个成功的故事。证据很明显:近十年前大张旗鼓地公布的NCLB法案,对美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)学生造成的伤害大于好处——印度领导人说,这绝对是必要的,下次,我们要让这个国家最重要的教育法得到正确的实施。随着国会准备重新授权NCLB,印度领导人就AI/AN学生的教育提出了全面的建议(见侧栏),由于课程狭窄,土著语言和文化项目的丧失,以及适当使用年度进步(AYP),特别是在学生流动性高的印度社区,这些学生的表现在NCLB下停滞不前。最近的报告显示,美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)学生的辍学率在全国名列前茅,自2005年以来,原住民儿童是唯一在数学和科学成绩上没有显著进步的学生(AI/AN八年级学生的阅读成绩略有提高)。此外,美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民比其他任何种族或族裔群体更有可能成为特殊教育服务的目标,而土著学生的休学和开除率仅次于非洲裔美国人。人工智能/人工智能教育工作者表示,在这种情况下,丧失本土课程对那些已经与自己的文化隔绝的学生来说尤其有害。绝大多数印度学生就读于非保留地的公立学校,这些学校的学生群体非常多样化,而本土教育者的数量有限。因此,……