The Use of Biologic Agents in the Treatment of Oral Lesions due to Pemphigus and Behcet's Disease: A Systematic Review

G. Davis, George Sarandev, Alexander T. Vaughan, K. Al-Eryani, Reyes
{"title":"The Use of Biologic Agents in the Treatment of Oral Lesions due to Pemphigus and Behcet's Disease: A Systematic Review","authors":"G. Davis, George Sarandev, Alexander T. Vaughan, K. Al-Eryani, Reyes","doi":"10.29245/2768-5365/2020/1.1105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Current treatments for pemphigus and Behcet's disease, such as corticosteroids, have long-term serious adverse effects. Objective: The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of biologic agents (biopharmaceuticals manufactured via a biological source) on the treatment of intraoral lesions associated with pemphigus and Behcet's disease compared to glucocorticoids or placebo. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched for randomized controlled studies up to January 2019. Bias was assessed with the risk of bias tool. Results: Out of 740 references retrieved, only four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, comprised of a total of 158 subjects (138 pemphigus and 20 Behcet's disease). All studies were assessed at high risk of bias. Heterogeneity of data prevented the authors from performing a meta-analysis. Infliximab or rituximab with short-term prednisone showed higher safety and lowered cumulative prednisone dose than prednisone alone in the treatment of pemphigus. Subcutaneous injection of etanercept provided 45% of patients free of ulcers compared to 5% in the placebo group in one study with Behcet's disease; however, no difference was found in pemphigus patients. Conclusion: Though biological agents alone or in combination with prednisone showed favorable results in three RCTs compared to prednisone alone or placebo, a meta-analysis could not be undertaken due to high heterogeneity. Results are inconclusive, and larger, well-designed RCTs are needed.","PeriodicalId":111293,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesiology and Pain Therapy","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesiology and Pain Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29245/2768-5365/2020/1.1105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current treatments for pemphigus and Behcet's disease, such as corticosteroids, have long-term serious adverse effects. Objective: The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of biologic agents (biopharmaceuticals manufactured via a biological source) on the treatment of intraoral lesions associated with pemphigus and Behcet's disease compared to glucocorticoids or placebo. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched for randomized controlled studies up to January 2019. Bias was assessed with the risk of bias tool. Results: Out of 740 references retrieved, only four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, comprised of a total of 158 subjects (138 pemphigus and 20 Behcet's disease). All studies were assessed at high risk of bias. Heterogeneity of data prevented the authors from performing a meta-analysis. Infliximab or rituximab with short-term prednisone showed higher safety and lowered cumulative prednisone dose than prednisone alone in the treatment of pemphigus. Subcutaneous injection of etanercept provided 45% of patients free of ulcers compared to 5% in the placebo group in one study with Behcet's disease; however, no difference was found in pemphigus patients. Conclusion: Though biological agents alone or in combination with prednisone showed favorable results in three RCTs compared to prednisone alone or placebo, a meta-analysis could not be undertaken due to high heterogeneity. Results are inconclusive, and larger, well-designed RCTs are needed.
生物制剂在天疱疮和白塞病口腔病变治疗中的应用:系统综述
背景:目前治疗天疱疮和白塞病,如皮质类固醇,有长期严重的不良反应。目的:本系统综述的目的是评价生物制剂(通过生物来源生产的生物药品)与糖皮质激素或安慰剂相比,在治疗天疱疮和白塞病相关的口腔内病变方面的疗效。方法:检索截至2019年1月的PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library和EMBASE随机对照研究。使用偏倚风险工具评估偏倚。结果:在检索到的740篇文献中,仅包括4项随机对照试验(rct),共包括158名受试者(138名天疱疮患者和20名白塞病患者)。所有的研究都被评估为高偏倚风险。数据的异质性使作者无法进行meta分析。英夫利昔单抗或利妥昔单抗联合短期强的松治疗天疱疮的安全性更高,且累积强的松剂量低于单独使用强的松。在一项白塞氏病的研究中,皮下注射依那西普使45%的患者没有溃疡,而安慰剂组只有5%;然而,在天疱疮患者中没有发现差异。结论:虽然在三个随机对照试验中,生物制剂单独使用或与泼尼松联合使用比单独使用泼尼松或安慰剂效果更好,但由于异质性高,不能进行荟萃分析。结果尚无定论,需要更大规模、设计良好的随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信