EVALUATING THE ROLE OF THE COMMITTEE IN IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF EDUCATION

U. Umiyati
{"title":"EVALUATING THE ROLE OF THE COMMITTEE IN IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF EDUCATION","authors":"U. Umiyati","doi":"10.22236/jkpuhamka.v4i1.7473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to evaluate how the role of  the school committee in improving the quality of education at SDN Peninggilan 5. The method used in this research is a qualitative method, with a descriptive approach and a Provus model (inequality by comparing the standards set by the Decree of the Minister of National Education Number 044 / U / 2002 and its implementation in SDN Peninggilan 5. The results showed that the role of the school committee as a provider of consideration, supporter, controller and liaison had been implemented but was maximally determined by the government. As a giver of consideration, the committee has not been seen to be active in providing input and consideration in planning school programs and policies. As a supporter, the School Committee has been active in providing support for the procurement and management of infrastructure, human resources, and funding, in carrying out its role as a controller of the planning and implementation of school programs, reports of observations are still in the form of oral and incidental information. The role as a liaison is good enough, but the cooperative relationship with the community is still lacking. In general, the Peninggilan 5 State Elementary School (SDN) committee plays a role in improving the quality of the school by helping morally and materially.","PeriodicalId":339206,"journal":{"name":"JKP | Jurnal Kepemimpinan Pendidikan","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JKP | Jurnal Kepemimpinan Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22236/jkpuhamka.v4i1.7473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate how the role of  the school committee in improving the quality of education at SDN Peninggilan 5. The method used in this research is a qualitative method, with a descriptive approach and a Provus model (inequality by comparing the standards set by the Decree of the Minister of National Education Number 044 / U / 2002 and its implementation in SDN Peninggilan 5. The results showed that the role of the school committee as a provider of consideration, supporter, controller and liaison had been implemented but was maximally determined by the government. As a giver of consideration, the committee has not been seen to be active in providing input and consideration in planning school programs and policies. As a supporter, the School Committee has been active in providing support for the procurement and management of infrastructure, human resources, and funding, in carrying out its role as a controller of the planning and implementation of school programs, reports of observations are still in the form of oral and incidental information. The role as a liaison is good enough, but the cooperative relationship with the community is still lacking. In general, the Peninggilan 5 State Elementary School (SDN) committee plays a role in improving the quality of the school by helping morally and materially.
评估委员会在提高教育质量方面的作用
本研究旨在评估学校委员会在提升彭宁吉兰中学教育质素方面所扮演的角色。本研究使用的方法是定性方法,通过比较国家教育部长第044 / U / 2002号法令及其在Peninggilan 5的实施所设定的标准,采用描述性方法和Provus模型(不平等)。结果显示,学校委员会作为考虑者、支持者、控制者和联络人的角色已经落实,但最大程度上是由政府决定的。作为一个给予考虑的人,委员会在规划学校项目和政策方面并没有积极提供投入和考虑。作为支持者,学校委员会积极为基础设施、人力资源和资金的采购和管理提供支持,履行其作为学校项目规划和实施控制者的角色,观察报告仍以口头和附带信息的形式存在。作为联络人的作用已经足够好了,但与社区的合作关系仍然缺乏。总的来说,Peninggilan State Elementary School (SDN)委员会通过道德和物质上的帮助,在提高学校质量方面发挥了作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信