Thinking Process of Mathematics Education Students in Problem Solving Proof

D. D. Yohanie, Gloria A. Botchway, Alakanani A. Nkhwalume, Mohammed Arrazaki
{"title":"Thinking Process of Mathematics Education Students in Problem Solving Proof","authors":"D. D. Yohanie, Gloria A. Botchway, Alakanani A. Nkhwalume, Mohammed Arrazaki","doi":"10.37251/ijome.v1i1.611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This type of research is quantitative research. This study used document analysis, interviews and evidence problem solving task instruments. Qualitative data analysis was carried out interactively. The results of this study are the thinking processes of  2nd semester Mathematics Education students who have high learning achievements. Solving the problem of proof in a direct way, contraposition, and contradiction in the entry phase of the thought process activity obtained is the same, that is, the subject understands the problem by writing down the antecedents as what is known and the consequent as what must be proven. The thinking process of 2nd semester Mathematics Education students who have moderate learning achievements. Solving the problem of proof in a direct way, contraposition, and contradiction in the entry phase of the thought process activity obtained is the same, that is, the subject understands the problem by writing down the antecedents as what is known and the consequence as what must be proven. The thinking process of 2nd semester Mathematics Education students who have low learning achievements. Solving the problem of proof in a direct way, contraposition, and contradiction in the entering phase of the thinking process activity obtained is the same, that is, the subject understands the problem by writing down the antecedents as what is known and the consequent as what must be proven","PeriodicalId":268663,"journal":{"name":"Interval: Indonesian Journal of Mathematical Education","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interval: Indonesian Journal of Mathematical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37251/ijome.v1i1.611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This type of research is quantitative research. This study used document analysis, interviews and evidence problem solving task instruments. Qualitative data analysis was carried out interactively. The results of this study are the thinking processes of  2nd semester Mathematics Education students who have high learning achievements. Solving the problem of proof in a direct way, contraposition, and contradiction in the entry phase of the thought process activity obtained is the same, that is, the subject understands the problem by writing down the antecedents as what is known and the consequent as what must be proven. The thinking process of 2nd semester Mathematics Education students who have moderate learning achievements. Solving the problem of proof in a direct way, contraposition, and contradiction in the entry phase of the thought process activity obtained is the same, that is, the subject understands the problem by writing down the antecedents as what is known and the consequence as what must be proven. The thinking process of 2nd semester Mathematics Education students who have low learning achievements. Solving the problem of proof in a direct way, contraposition, and contradiction in the entering phase of the thinking process activity obtained is the same, that is, the subject understands the problem by writing down the antecedents as what is known and the consequent as what must be proven
数学教育学生解题证明的思维过程
这种类型的研究是定量研究。本研究采用文献分析、访谈和证据解决问题的任务工具。定性数据分析是交互式的。本研究的结果为数学教育第二学期学生的思维过程。在思维过程活动的起始阶段,用直接的方法、对立和矛盾来解决证明问题,也是同样的道理,也就是说,主词理解这个问题时,把先行词记为已知的东西,把结果记为必须证明的东西。数学教育第二学期中等学习成绩学生的思维过程。在思维过程活动的起始阶段,以直接的方式、对立和矛盾来解决证明问题,也同样如此,即主词通过写下已知的前提和必须证明的结果来理解证明问题。第二学期数学教育低年级学生的思维过程在思维过程活动的起始阶段,以直接的方式、对立和矛盾来解决证明问题,也是同样的道理,也就是说,主词通过写下已知的先行词和必须证明的结果词来理解证明问题
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信