Return Smoothing and Loan Fund Flows: Can Investors See Through to Fair Value?

M. Emin, C. James
{"title":"Return Smoothing and Loan Fund Flows: Can Investors See Through to Fair Value?","authors":"M. Emin, C. James","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3931100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past decade loan mutual funds have emerged as major investors in syndicated loans. Unlike other investors in syndicated loans, mutual funds are required to mark their loans to market daily when calculating the funds’ net asset value (NAV). Marking to market is challenging because loans are not traded on a centralized exchange and unlike corporate bonds trades, loan trades lack post trade transparency. Thus, determining the fair value of loans involves potentially greater discretion on the part of fund managers. In this paper we examine whether loan mutual fund managers use their discretion to smooth their reported returns and whether misreported returns affect the relationship between fund flows and performance. Overall, we find that evidence of widespread return smoothing by loan funds managers. We find that institutional investors are less likely to chase the returns of loan funds that engage in aggressive pricing of their holdings.","PeriodicalId":260048,"journal":{"name":"Capital Markets: Market Efficiency eJournal","volume":"161 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Capital Markets: Market Efficiency eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3931100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Over the past decade loan mutual funds have emerged as major investors in syndicated loans. Unlike other investors in syndicated loans, mutual funds are required to mark their loans to market daily when calculating the funds’ net asset value (NAV). Marking to market is challenging because loans are not traded on a centralized exchange and unlike corporate bonds trades, loan trades lack post trade transparency. Thus, determining the fair value of loans involves potentially greater discretion on the part of fund managers. In this paper we examine whether loan mutual fund managers use their discretion to smooth their reported returns and whether misreported returns affect the relationship between fund flows and performance. Overall, we find that evidence of widespread return smoothing by loan funds managers. We find that institutional investors are less likely to chase the returns of loan funds that engage in aggressive pricing of their holdings.
收益平滑与贷款资金流动:投资者能看穿公允价值吗?
在过去十年中,贷款共同基金已成为银团贷款的主要投资者。与银团贷款的其他投资者不同,在计算基金的资产净值(NAV)时,共同基金被要求每天按市值计算贷款。盯市具有挑战性,因为贷款不是在一个集中的交易所进行交易,而且与公司债券交易不同,贷款交易缺乏交易后的透明度。因此,确定贷款的公允价值可能涉及基金经理更大的自由裁量权。在本文中,我们研究了贷款共同基金经理是否使用他们的自由裁量权来平滑他们的报告收益,以及误报收益是否影响资金流动与绩效之间的关系。总体而言,我们发现贷款基金经理普遍存在收益平滑的证据。我们发现,机构投资者不太可能追逐那些对其持股进行激进定价的贷款基金的回报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信