Bridging the Gap Between Instruction and Assessment: Examining the Role of Dynamic Assessment in the Oral Proficiency Skills of English-as-an-Additional-Language Learners

J. Weisgerber
{"title":"Bridging the Gap Between Instruction and Assessment: Examining the Role of Dynamic Assessment in the Oral Proficiency Skills of English-as-an-Additional-Language Learners","authors":"J. Weisgerber","doi":"10.18357/AR.WEISGERBERJ.612015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This exploratory study investigated the role of dynamic assessment (DA) in improving the oral proficiency skills of English-as-an-additional-language learners. It focused specifically on speaking test scores and the use of language learner strategies, with the goal of providing empirical evidence as well as pedagogical recommendations. Seven participants were administered a section of the IELTSTM Speaking test in both dynamic and standardized formats. Each test was followed by a think-aloud protocol in order to ascertain participants’ thoughts and strategic behaviours during the testing process. In terms of test scores, results showed no holistic differences, but did show differences in fluency, grammatical range, and lexical resource scores. Scores for grammatical range and lexical resource were higher in DA, while scores for fluency were higher in standardized assessment. An analysis of the participants’ strategic behaviours also showed a greater use of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use in DA. These results point to DA’s potential to facilitate the development of grammatical and lexical abilities as well as to foster the use of language learner strategies within the sample.","PeriodicalId":143772,"journal":{"name":"The Arbutus Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Arbutus Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18357/AR.WEISGERBERJ.612015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This exploratory study investigated the role of dynamic assessment (DA) in improving the oral proficiency skills of English-as-an-additional-language learners. It focused specifically on speaking test scores and the use of language learner strategies, with the goal of providing empirical evidence as well as pedagogical recommendations. Seven participants were administered a section of the IELTSTM Speaking test in both dynamic and standardized formats. Each test was followed by a think-aloud protocol in order to ascertain participants’ thoughts and strategic behaviours during the testing process. In terms of test scores, results showed no holistic differences, but did show differences in fluency, grammatical range, and lexical resource scores. Scores for grammatical range and lexical resource were higher in DA, while scores for fluency were higher in standardized assessment. An analysis of the participants’ strategic behaviours also showed a greater use of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use in DA. These results point to DA’s potential to facilitate the development of grammatical and lexical abilities as well as to foster the use of language learner strategies within the sample.
弥合教学与评估之间的鸿沟:动态评估在英语作为附加语言学习者口语能力中的作用
本研究旨在探讨动态评估(DA)在提高英语作为附加语言学习者口语能力方面的作用。它特别关注口语考试成绩和语言学习者策略的使用,目的是提供经验证据和教学建议。7名参与者分别以动态和标准化两种形式进行了雅思口语测试。每个测试之后都有一个有声思考协议,以确定参与者在测试过程中的想法和策略行为。在测试分数方面,结果显示没有整体差异,但在流畅性,语法范围和词汇资源得分方面确实存在差异。语法范围和词汇资源在DA测试中得分较高,而流畅性在标准化测试中得分较高。对参与者策略行为的分析也表明,认知和元认知策略在数据处理中的使用更多。这些结果表明,数据分析在促进语法和词汇能力的发展以及促进语言学习者策略的使用方面具有潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信