Public Space, Infrastructure, Landscape: An Interdisciplinary Matrix for Urban Spatial Continuity

A. Brandão, P. Brandao
{"title":"Public Space, Infrastructure, Landscape: An Interdisciplinary Matrix for Urban Spatial Continuity","authors":"A. Brandão, P. Brandao","doi":"10.5204/JPS.V2I1.55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spatial growth of cities corresponded to new theoretical and practical knowledge capacities with new kinds of urban infrastructures, new services organisation and new construction methods, of XIX and most of XX century’s industrial space production. The decline of those capacities and a “crisis” of modern models, followed by the still on-going post-industrial transition process of the past 50 years are translated in many different forms of spatial, social, economic and cultural organisation and diversity of emerging urban contexts. Contemporary processes seem to carry difficulties in understanding and conducting urban transformation in such diverse and changing context. What strategic elements can be used to interpret and act in such contexts? In this paper we intend to show an interdisciplinary perspective of public space as part of strategic and theoretical principles recognised by several fields of urban knowledge and practice: we include the spatial continuity of the Commons in those structuring principles, as a notion of urban “publicness”. These new perspectives require a perception of public space that goes beyond traditional city references, to other peripheral or scattered urban areas, but maintaining its fundamental structuring role, as systemic and interactive reference for complex urban environments. Through a study on the specific case of the South Bank of Lisbon Metropolitan Area, we present a conceptual operative matrix, based on the hypothesis of strategic interaction between urban systems, aiming for its structuring potential for spatial continuity – public space, infrastructure and landscape. Outputs of this study aim at a contribution to a more flexible and interactive structuring approach to urban design and planning, focused on interdisciplinary perspectives of public space production.","PeriodicalId":394570,"journal":{"name":"Public Space Reader","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Space Reader","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5204/JPS.V2I1.55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Spatial growth of cities corresponded to new theoretical and practical knowledge capacities with new kinds of urban infrastructures, new services organisation and new construction methods, of XIX and most of XX century’s industrial space production. The decline of those capacities and a “crisis” of modern models, followed by the still on-going post-industrial transition process of the past 50 years are translated in many different forms of spatial, social, economic and cultural organisation and diversity of emerging urban contexts. Contemporary processes seem to carry difficulties in understanding and conducting urban transformation in such diverse and changing context. What strategic elements can be used to interpret and act in such contexts? In this paper we intend to show an interdisciplinary perspective of public space as part of strategic and theoretical principles recognised by several fields of urban knowledge and practice: we include the spatial continuity of the Commons in those structuring principles, as a notion of urban “publicness”. These new perspectives require a perception of public space that goes beyond traditional city references, to other peripheral or scattered urban areas, but maintaining its fundamental structuring role, as systemic and interactive reference for complex urban environments. Through a study on the specific case of the South Bank of Lisbon Metropolitan Area, we present a conceptual operative matrix, based on the hypothesis of strategic interaction between urban systems, aiming for its structuring potential for spatial continuity – public space, infrastructure and landscape. Outputs of this study aim at a contribution to a more flexible and interactive structuring approach to urban design and planning, focused on interdisciplinary perspectives of public space production.
公共空间、基础设施、景观:城市空间连续性的跨学科矩阵
城市的空间增长与19世纪和20世纪大部分工业空间生产的新的理论和实践知识能力、新的城市基础设施、新的服务组织和新的建设方法相对应。这些能力的衰退和现代模式的“危机”,以及过去50年仍在进行的后工业转型过程,都转化为许多不同形式的空间、社会、经济和文化组织,以及新兴城市背景的多样性。在如此多样化和不断变化的背景下,当代进程似乎在理解和实施城市转型方面存在困难。在这种情况下,可以使用哪些战略要素来解释和行动?在本文中,我们打算展示公共空间的跨学科视角,作为城市知识和实践多个领域认可的战略和理论原则的一部分:我们将公共空间的空间连续性纳入这些结构原则中,作为城市“公共性”的概念。这些新的视角需要对公共空间的感知,超越传统的城市参考,到其他外围或分散的城市地区,但保持其基本的结构作用,作为复杂城市环境的系统和互动参考。通过对里斯本都市区南岸具体案例的研究,我们提出了一个概念性的操作矩阵,基于城市系统之间战略互动的假设,旨在其空间连续性的结构潜力-公共空间,基础设施和景观。本研究的成果旨在为城市设计和规划提供更灵活和互动的结构方法,重点关注公共空间生产的跨学科观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信