Performance comparison of continuous optical beam steering approaches

Brandon Vreeland, A. V. Van Rynbach, D. Bryant, P. Bos
{"title":"Performance comparison of continuous optical beam steering approaches","authors":"Brandon Vreeland, A. V. Van Rynbach, D. Bryant, P. Bos","doi":"10.1117/12.2633673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two methods for designing a continuous optical beam steering device are to use a linear phase profile based on physical optical pathlength (OPL) , and based on Pancharatnam phase (PP) . There are challenges with both of these basic approaches when considering design goals of high steering angle range, resolution, speed, and efficiency. In this overview talk, a comparison will be made between these two approaches with regard to these design goals. The limiting effects on each of these design goals will be considered with detailed FDTD optical modeling, and compared with experimental measurements.","PeriodicalId":145218,"journal":{"name":"Organic Photonics + Electronics","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organic Photonics + Electronics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2633673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two methods for designing a continuous optical beam steering device are to use a linear phase profile based on physical optical pathlength (OPL) , and based on Pancharatnam phase (PP) . There are challenges with both of these basic approaches when considering design goals of high steering angle range, resolution, speed, and efficiency. In this overview talk, a comparison will be made between these two approaches with regard to these design goals. The limiting effects on each of these design goals will be considered with detailed FDTD optical modeling, and compared with experimental measurements.
连续光束转向方法的性能比较
设计连续光束导向装置的两种方法是基于物理光路长度(OPL)的线性相位轮廓和基于Pancharatnam相位(PP)。当考虑到高转向角度范围、分辨率、速度和效率的设计目标时,这两种基本方法都存在挑战。在这篇概述演讲中,将对这两种方法进行比较,以实现这些设计目标。对每个设计目标的限制影响将通过详细的FDTD光学建模来考虑,并与实验测量进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信