N. Richardson, James A. Smith, S. Robertson, P. Baker
{"title":"Global Men’s Health Policy","authors":"N. Richardson, James A. Smith, S. Robertson, P. Baker","doi":"10.4324/9781315167428-13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Historically, men, as a population group, have been largely absent at global and national health policy levels (Rovito et al., 2017). It is widely taken for granted that most gender-focused health policy initiatives and gender-mainstreaming (GM) approaches to health are, in reality, really about women’s health. This is despite GM—which can be understood as “a deliberate and systematic approach to integrating a gender perspective into analysis, procedures and policies” per the definition by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (as cited in Hankivsky, 2005, p. 980)—becoming, over the last 15 years, the officially agreed-upon strategy to promote gender equity in health internationally. The approach was adopted at the Fourth World Conference on Women in 1995 and subsequently ratified by the United Nations (UN; Tolhurst et al., 2012).","PeriodicalId":194947,"journal":{"name":"Men’s Health Equity","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Men’s Health Equity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315167428-13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Abstract
Historically, men, as a population group, have been largely absent at global and national health policy levels (Rovito et al., 2017). It is widely taken for granted that most gender-focused health policy initiatives and gender-mainstreaming (GM) approaches to health are, in reality, really about women’s health. This is despite GM—which can be understood as “a deliberate and systematic approach to integrating a gender perspective into analysis, procedures and policies” per the definition by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (as cited in Hankivsky, 2005, p. 980)—becoming, over the last 15 years, the officially agreed-upon strategy to promote gender equity in health internationally. The approach was adopted at the Fourth World Conference on Women in 1995 and subsequently ratified by the United Nations (UN; Tolhurst et al., 2012).
从历史上看,男性作为一个人口群体,在全球和国家卫生政策层面基本上是缺席的(Rovito等人,2017)。人们普遍理所当然地认为,大多数以性别为重点的保健政策倡议和将性别问题纳入主流的保健办法实际上都是关于妇女健康的。根据经济合作与发展组织(Hankivsky, 2005, p. 980)的定义,转基因可以被理解为“一种将性别观点纳入分析、程序和政策的深思熟虑和系统的方法”,尽管如此,在过去的15年里,转基因已成为官方商定的战略,以促进国际卫生领域的性别平等。1995年第四次妇女问题世界会议通过了这一办法,随后得到联合国的批准(联合国;Tolhurst et al., 2012)。