Voluntariness as a “cross-cutting” principle of marriage relations in the Republic of Kazakhstan (some private-legal and public-legal aspects)

T. Zhunussova
{"title":"Voluntariness as a “cross-cutting” principle of marriage relations in the Republic of Kazakhstan (some private-legal and public-legal aspects)","authors":"T. Zhunussova","doi":"10.31489/2023l2/127-138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents a theoretical analysis of some controversial aspects of the legislative provision of the principle of voluntary marriage in Kazakhstan, which is investigated in the necessary “triad”: voluntary mar- riage, voluntary stay in marriage and voluntary termination of marital relations. The legislator's explicit em- phasis on voluntariness, exclusively, as a principle of marriage leads to the fact that it is significantly leveled in the other two manifestations of this “triad”. The author analyzes the normative provisions of the marriage and family legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, other normative legal acts of national legislation, as well as a comparative legal study of the regulatory regulation of certain private issues in neighboring coun- tries, on the basis of which some violations of the principle of voluntariness in the norms of domestic mar- riage and family legislation are illustrated. At the same time, the continuing trends of domestic legislation to- wards the presence of norms with pronounced gender asymmetry, which currently has no objective socio- legal justification, are revealed. The conflict-causing potential of the remaining legislative prohibitions in matters of divorce, which do not contribute to ensuring the principles of marriage relations in the Republic of Kazakhstan, is argued, and options for correcting legislative prescriptions are proposed in order to significant- ly reduce it.","PeriodicalId":302577,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Karaganda University. “Law Series”","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Karaganda University. “Law Series”","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31489/2023l2/127-138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents a theoretical analysis of some controversial aspects of the legislative provision of the principle of voluntary marriage in Kazakhstan, which is investigated in the necessary “triad”: voluntary mar- riage, voluntary stay in marriage and voluntary termination of marital relations. The legislator's explicit em- phasis on voluntariness, exclusively, as a principle of marriage leads to the fact that it is significantly leveled in the other two manifestations of this “triad”. The author analyzes the normative provisions of the marriage and family legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, other normative legal acts of national legislation, as well as a comparative legal study of the regulatory regulation of certain private issues in neighboring coun- tries, on the basis of which some violations of the principle of voluntariness in the norms of domestic mar- riage and family legislation are illustrated. At the same time, the continuing trends of domestic legislation to- wards the presence of norms with pronounced gender asymmetry, which currently has no objective socio- legal justification, are revealed. The conflict-causing potential of the remaining legislative prohibitions in matters of divorce, which do not contribute to ensuring the principles of marriage relations in the Republic of Kazakhstan, is argued, and options for correcting legislative prescriptions are proposed in order to significant- ly reduce it.
自愿作为哈萨克斯坦共和国婚姻关系的“跨领域”原则(一些私法和公法方面)
本文从理论上分析了哈萨克斯坦自愿结婚原则立法规定中存在的一些争议,并从自愿结婚、自愿保持婚姻关系和自愿解除婚姻关系这三个必要的“三位一体”进行了考察。立法者明确强调自愿,排他性,作为婚姻的原则,导致它在这“三位一体”的其他两种表现中显着平等。作者分析了哈萨克斯坦共和国婚姻家庭立法的规范性规定和国家立法的其他规范性法律行为,并对邻国对某些私人问题的规制进行了比较法律研究,在此基础上说明了国内婚姻家庭立法规范中违反自愿原则的一些情况。与此同时,国内立法继续趋向于存在明显的性别不对称规范,而这种规范目前没有客观的社会法律依据。本文认为,关于离婚事项的其余立法禁令可能造成冲突,这无助于确保哈萨克斯坦共和国的婚姻关系原则,并提出了纠正立法规定的备选办法,以便大大减少这种可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信