An FAHP-based Quantitative Method for Risk Assessment of Debris-flow Hazards Using Different Fuzzy Numbers

Li-Jeng Huang
{"title":"An FAHP-based Quantitative Method for Risk Assessment of Debris-flow Hazards Using Different Fuzzy Numbers","authors":"Li-Jeng Huang","doi":"10.13101/IJECE.9.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) for risk assessment of debris-flow occurrence using three different fuzzy numbers. Three layers are involved in the structure of the FAHP: the goal layer, the criteria layer, and the sub-criteria layer. In the criteria and sub-criteria layers, nine major influence factors are grouped into three categories: (1) topological and geological conditions, which includes the influence factors of slope angle, type of deposit, grain size distribution, and surface plants; (2) watershed conditions, which includes effective watershed area and quantity of outflow of sediment; and (3) rainfall conditions, which includes rainfall intensity, duration, and accumulated rainfall. Judgment regarding the relative influence of these factors is based on a nine-level scale used to form the fuzzy reciprocal judgment matrices for evaluating the weighting vectors for each layer. Two cases of debris-flow disasters that occurred in eastern Taiwan were tested using the FAHP; one was a debris flow, and the other a mudslide. The results showed that the proposed FAHP models using the three kinds of fuzzy numbers as well as the associated influence factors and criteria can successfully predict the risk of debris-flow hazard occurrence. Furthermore, the predicted overall risk indices obtained from the FAHP using the three kinds of fuzzy numbers were smaller than those obtained from AHP, but more practical due to consideration of the uncertainty and vagueness involved in natural hazards.","PeriodicalId":378771,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Erosion Control Engineering","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Erosion Control Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13101/IJECE.9.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper presents the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) for risk assessment of debris-flow occurrence using three different fuzzy numbers. Three layers are involved in the structure of the FAHP: the goal layer, the criteria layer, and the sub-criteria layer. In the criteria and sub-criteria layers, nine major influence factors are grouped into three categories: (1) topological and geological conditions, which includes the influence factors of slope angle, type of deposit, grain size distribution, and surface plants; (2) watershed conditions, which includes effective watershed area and quantity of outflow of sediment; and (3) rainfall conditions, which includes rainfall intensity, duration, and accumulated rainfall. Judgment regarding the relative influence of these factors is based on a nine-level scale used to form the fuzzy reciprocal judgment matrices for evaluating the weighting vectors for each layer. Two cases of debris-flow disasters that occurred in eastern Taiwan were tested using the FAHP; one was a debris flow, and the other a mudslide. The results showed that the proposed FAHP models using the three kinds of fuzzy numbers as well as the associated influence factors and criteria can successfully predict the risk of debris-flow hazard occurrence. Furthermore, the predicted overall risk indices obtained from the FAHP using the three kinds of fuzzy numbers were smaller than those obtained from AHP, but more practical due to consideration of the uncertainty and vagueness involved in natural hazards.
基于fahp的不同模糊数泥石流危险性定量评价方法
本文提出了采用三种不同模糊数进行泥石流发生风险评价的模糊层次分析法。FAHP的结构涉及三个层:目标层、标准层和子标准层。在判据层和分判据层中,将9个主要影响因素分为三类:(1)地形地质条件,包括坡角、矿床类型、粒度分布、地表植物等影响因素;(2)流域条件,包括有效流域面积和出沙量;(3)降雨条件,包括降雨强度、持续时间和累积雨量。对这些因素的相对影响的判断是基于一个九级量表,用于形成模糊互反判断矩阵来评估每一层的权重向量。利用FAHP对发生在台湾东部的两例泥石流灾害进行了测试;一次是泥石流,另一次是泥石流。结果表明,采用这三种模糊数及其相关影响因素和准则建立的FAHP模型能够较好地预测泥石流灾害发生风险。此外,考虑到自然灾害的不确定性和模糊性,使用三种模糊数的FAHP预测的总体风险指数比AHP预测的总体风险指数小,但更实用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信