Strategies for addressing investor liquidity concerns and funding capital needs in real estate funds

James L. Broderick, M. Giles
{"title":"Strategies for addressing investor liquidity concerns and funding capital needs in real estate funds","authors":"James L. Broderick, M. Giles","doi":"10.1108/joic-10-2020-0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nTo discuss issues that real estate fund sponsors may encounter due to investor liquidity constraints amidst the COVID-19 pandemic (such as investors seeking redemptions or transfers) and to provide guidance on potential ways that fund sponsors can prepare for, and respond to, such inquiries while at the same time addressing their fund’s liquidity needs (such as by utilizing subscription-secured credit facilities).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe article identifies the types of requests that investors may make to address their internal liquidity constraints, discusses contractual, legal, regulatory and business issues that fund sponsors should consider in responding to such requests and provides some alternatives for fund sponsors to consider allowing them to be responsive to investor liquidity concerns while also addressing fund capital needs.\n\n\nFindings\nThe article finds that there are specific actions which fund sponsors should take in anticipating, and responding to, investor liquidity requests, such as reviewing partnership documents and credit facility documents and considering consequences in respect of ERISA, tax and compliance with applicable securities laws. The article also finds that specific affirmative actions by fund sponsors, such as increased borrowings under credit facilities, making distributions that are recallable and favoring transfers over withdrawals or redemptions may assist fund sponsors in preserving capital while addressing investor liquidity requests.\n\n\nPractical implications\nFund sponsors should carefully review their fund documentation and determine their options and requirements as they pertain to potential liquidity requests. Fund sponsors should be careful to avoid foot-faults under their fund documents and credit facility agreements.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nPractical guidance from experienced fund formation, securities law, tax, ERISA and finance lawyers.\n","PeriodicalId":399186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investment Compliance","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investment Compliance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/joic-10-2020-0034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose To discuss issues that real estate fund sponsors may encounter due to investor liquidity constraints amidst the COVID-19 pandemic (such as investors seeking redemptions or transfers) and to provide guidance on potential ways that fund sponsors can prepare for, and respond to, such inquiries while at the same time addressing their fund’s liquidity needs (such as by utilizing subscription-secured credit facilities). Design/methodology/approach The article identifies the types of requests that investors may make to address their internal liquidity constraints, discusses contractual, legal, regulatory and business issues that fund sponsors should consider in responding to such requests and provides some alternatives for fund sponsors to consider allowing them to be responsive to investor liquidity concerns while also addressing fund capital needs. Findings The article finds that there are specific actions which fund sponsors should take in anticipating, and responding to, investor liquidity requests, such as reviewing partnership documents and credit facility documents and considering consequences in respect of ERISA, tax and compliance with applicable securities laws. The article also finds that specific affirmative actions by fund sponsors, such as increased borrowings under credit facilities, making distributions that are recallable and favoring transfers over withdrawals or redemptions may assist fund sponsors in preserving capital while addressing investor liquidity requests. Practical implications Fund sponsors should carefully review their fund documentation and determine their options and requirements as they pertain to potential liquidity requests. Fund sponsors should be careful to avoid foot-faults under their fund documents and credit facility agreements. Originality/value Practical guidance from experienced fund formation, securities law, tax, ERISA and finance lawyers.
解决投资者流动性问题和房地产基金资金需求的策略
目的讨论2019冠状病毒病大流行期间房地产基金发起人可能因投资者流动性限制而遇到的问题(例如投资者寻求赎回或转让),并就基金发起人在解决其基金流动性需求(例如利用认购担保信贷安排)的同时准备和回应此类询问的潜在方式提供指导。设计/方法/方法本文确定了投资者为解决其内部流动性约束而可能提出的要求类型,讨论了基金保荐人在回应此类要求时应考虑的合同、法律、监管和业务问题,并为基金保荐人提供了一些备选方案,使其能够在满足基金资本需求的同时,对投资者的流动性问题作出回应。本文发现,基金发起人在预测和响应投资者流动性请求时应采取具体行动,例如审查合伙文件和信贷安排文件,并考虑ERISA,税收和遵守适用证券法方面的后果。文章还发现,基金发起人采取的具体积极行动,如增加信贷额度下的借款,进行可收回的分配,以及倾向于转移而不是提取或赎回,可能有助于基金发起人在解决投资者流动性要求的同时保留资本。实际影响基金发起人应仔细审查其基金文件,并确定与潜在流动性要求有关的选择和要求。基金发起人应小心避免在其基金文件和信贷安排协议中出现错误。来自经验丰富的基金组建、证券法、税务、ERISA和金融律师的实用指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信