STRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY: EVOLUTION OF THEORIES

I. Steblianko
{"title":"STRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY: EVOLUTION OF THEORIES","authors":"I. Steblianko","doi":"10.15550/ASJ.2017.01.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance of this article is determined by the importance of search for new strategic development benchmarks for Ukraine in the context of signing the Association Agreement with EU, and by the struggle to cope with the consequences of the systemic socio-economic crisis, as well as with its military and political ramifications. The methodology laid out below rests on the pillars of both theory and practice. General scientific methods of research include the systemic approach as a tool to generalize the theories of structural development of economy, the dialectic approach, to review economic categories from the standpoint of evolvement, along with analysis and synthesis, to substantiate the definition of structural development of the national economy, and adaptation, to make economic theories applicable to the environment of reforms in the national economy, in view of the recent institutional changes taking place in Ukraine. Theoretical value of the findings lies in the generalization of theories on structural development of economy, such as the theory of economic dynamics, theory of global development system dynamics, theory of structural change, theory of postindustrial society and institutional theory. Practical value of the findings can be expressed in the following recommendations: to improve public sector capacity in terms of generating and implementing economic reforms; to import and implement European institutes; to attract foreign investments, in order to promote new economic structures; to protect property rights, and to react against informal institutes, primarily represented by corruption.","PeriodicalId":403624,"journal":{"name":"The Advanced Science Journal","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Advanced Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15550/ASJ.2017.01.025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relevance of this article is determined by the importance of search for new strategic development benchmarks for Ukraine in the context of signing the Association Agreement with EU, and by the struggle to cope with the consequences of the systemic socio-economic crisis, as well as with its military and political ramifications. The methodology laid out below rests on the pillars of both theory and practice. General scientific methods of research include the systemic approach as a tool to generalize the theories of structural development of economy, the dialectic approach, to review economic categories from the standpoint of evolvement, along with analysis and synthesis, to substantiate the definition of structural development of the national economy, and adaptation, to make economic theories applicable to the environment of reforms in the national economy, in view of the recent institutional changes taking place in Ukraine. Theoretical value of the findings lies in the generalization of theories on structural development of economy, such as the theory of economic dynamics, theory of global development system dynamics, theory of structural change, theory of postindustrial society and institutional theory. Practical value of the findings can be expressed in the following recommendations: to improve public sector capacity in terms of generating and implementing economic reforms; to import and implement European institutes; to attract foreign investments, in order to promote new economic structures; to protect property rights, and to react against informal institutes, primarily represented by corruption.
经济结构发展:理论演进
本文的相关性取决于在与欧盟签署联系国协定的背景下为乌克兰寻找新的战略发展基准的重要性,以及应对系统性社会经济危机及其军事和政治后果的斗争。下面列出的方法以理论和实践为基础。一般的科学研究方法包括:以系统方法为工具概括经济结构发展理论;辩证方法,从演化的角度审视经济范畴,结合分析和综合,实证国民经济结构发展的定义;适应,使经济理论适用于国民经济改革的环境;鉴于最近在乌克兰发生的体制变化。研究成果的理论价值在于概括了经济动力学理论、全球发展系统动力学理论、结构变迁理论、后工业社会理论和制度理论等经济结构发展理论。调查结果的实际价值可以通过以下建议来表达:在产生和执行经济改革方面提高公共部门的能力;引进和实施欧洲机构;吸引外国投资,以促进新的经济结构;保护产权,反对以腐败为主要代表的非正式制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信