EFEKTIVITAS PRINSIP FIRST TO FILE PADA SISTEM PENDAFTARAN MEREK DALAM MELINDUNGI HAK MEREK

Raden Fajar Agung Kusumahwardhana
{"title":"EFEKTIVITAS PRINSIP FIRST TO FILE PADA SISTEM PENDAFTARAN MEREK DALAM MELINDUNGI HAK MEREK","authors":"Raden Fajar Agung Kusumahwardhana","doi":"10.20961/privat.v11i1.47322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of writing this article aims is to find out how the effectiveness of the implementation of the First To File principle in the trademark registration system and what problems arise from the application of the First To File principle in protecting trademark rights in Indonesia.This research is descriptive analytical as a description of a situation, and provides data about a situation. Collecting data in this writing is done in literature by examining data consisting of primary legal material and secondary legal material, then the data is analyzed using normative-qualitative methods.The results of the writing of this article indicate that Law Number 21 of 1961 concerning Company Marks and Commercial Trademarks which adhere to the First To Use system has been replaced by Law Number 19 of 1992 concerning Trademarks which applies the First To File principle. The First To File principle in the trademark registration system provides more legal certainty because it appoints the first registrant as the legal owner of a mark if it has passed a series of mark registration and has a trademark certificate, but in its implementation there are problems with the absence of clear and firm norms related to the application of \"equality in essence. \"So as to open up opportunities for the emergence of popularity of Well-Known Mark. Keywords: Intellectual Property Rights; Trademark; First To File.","PeriodicalId":422839,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Privat Law","volume":"03 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Privat Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v11i1.47322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of writing this article aims is to find out how the effectiveness of the implementation of the First To File principle in the trademark registration system and what problems arise from the application of the First To File principle in protecting trademark rights in Indonesia.This research is descriptive analytical as a description of a situation, and provides data about a situation. Collecting data in this writing is done in literature by examining data consisting of primary legal material and secondary legal material, then the data is analyzed using normative-qualitative methods.The results of the writing of this article indicate that Law Number 21 of 1961 concerning Company Marks and Commercial Trademarks which adhere to the First To Use system has been replaced by Law Number 19 of 1992 concerning Trademarks which applies the First To File principle. The First To File principle in the trademark registration system provides more legal certainty because it appoints the first registrant as the legal owner of a mark if it has passed a series of mark registration and has a trademark certificate, but in its implementation there are problems with the absence of clear and firm norms related to the application of "equality in essence. "So as to open up opportunities for the emergence of popularity of Well-Known Mark. Keywords: Intellectual Property Rights; Trademark; First To File.
原则首先在保护品牌权利的注册系统上提交文件的有效性
写这篇文章的目的是为了了解印尼商标注册制度中优先申请原则的实施效果如何,以及在印尼商标权利保护中优先申请原则的应用产生了哪些问题。这项研究是描述性的分析作为一种情况的描述,并提供有关一种情况的数据。在这篇文章中收集数据是通过检查由主要法律材料和次要法律材料组成的数据在文献中完成的,然后使用规范定性方法分析数据。本文的写作结果表明,1961年关于公司商标和商业商标的第21号法律坚持先使用制度,已被1992年关于商标的第19号法律所取代,该法律适用先申请原则。商标注册制度中的先申请原则为通过一系列商标注册并取得商标证书的第一注册人提供了更大的法律确定性,但在实施过程中存在“本质上平等”的适用缺乏明确而坚定的规范等问题。从而为知名度高的驰名商标的出现开辟了机会。关键词:知识产权;商标;第一个申请。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信