A New Error-Modeling of Hardy’s Paradox for Superconducting Qubits and Its Experimental Verification

S. Das, G. Paul
{"title":"A New Error-Modeling of Hardy’s Paradox for Superconducting Qubits and Its Experimental Verification","authors":"S. Das, G. Paul","doi":"10.1145/3396239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hardy’s paradox (equivalently, Hardy’s non-locality or Hardy’s test) [Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2981 (1992)] is used to show non-locality without inequalities, and it has been tested several times using optical circuits. We, for the first time, experimentally test Hardy’s paradox of non-locality in superconducting qubits. For practical verification of Hardy’s paradox, we argue that the error-modeling used in optical circuits is not useful for superconducting qubits. So, we propose a new error-modeling for Hardy’s paradox and a new method to estimate the lower bound on Hardy’s probability (i.e., the probability of a specific event in Hardy’s test) for superconducting qubits. Our results confirmed the theory that any non-maximally entangled state of two qubits violates Hardy’s equations; whereas, any maximally entangled state and product state of two qubits do not exhibit Hardy’s non-locality. Further, we point out the difficulties associated with the practical implementation of quantum protocols based on Hardy’s paradox and propose possible remedies. We also propose two performance measures for any two qubits of any quantum computer based on superconducting qubits.","PeriodicalId":365166,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3396239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Hardy’s paradox (equivalently, Hardy’s non-locality or Hardy’s test) [Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2981 (1992)] is used to show non-locality without inequalities, and it has been tested several times using optical circuits. We, for the first time, experimentally test Hardy’s paradox of non-locality in superconducting qubits. For practical verification of Hardy’s paradox, we argue that the error-modeling used in optical circuits is not useful for superconducting qubits. So, we propose a new error-modeling for Hardy’s paradox and a new method to estimate the lower bound on Hardy’s probability (i.e., the probability of a specific event in Hardy’s test) for superconducting qubits. Our results confirmed the theory that any non-maximally entangled state of two qubits violates Hardy’s equations; whereas, any maximally entangled state and product state of two qubits do not exhibit Hardy’s non-locality. Further, we point out the difficulties associated with the practical implementation of quantum protocols based on Hardy’s paradox and propose possible remedies. We also propose two performance measures for any two qubits of any quantum computer based on superconducting qubits.
超导量子比特Hardy悖论的一种新的误差建模及其实验验证
哈代悖论(也就是哈代的非定域性或哈代的检验)[物理学]。Rev. Lett. 68, 2981(1992)]用于显示无不等式的非局部性,并且已经使用光学电路进行了多次测试。我们首次在超导量子比特中实验测试了哈迪的非定域性悖论。为了实际验证Hardy悖论,我们认为光学电路中使用的误差建模对于超导量子比特是无用的。因此,我们提出了一种新的Hardy悖论误差模型和一种估计超导量子比特Hardy概率下界(即Hardy检验中特定事件的概率)的新方法。我们的结果证实了两个量子位的任何非最大纠缠态违反哈代方程的理论;然而,两个量子位元的任何最大纠缠态和乘积态都不表现出Hardy的非局域性。此外,我们指出了与基于哈代悖论的量子协议的实际实施相关的困难,并提出了可能的补救措施。我们还提出了基于超导量子比特的任意量子计算机的任意两个量子比特的两个性能度量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信