Love and Hatred

J. Haas, K. Vogt
{"title":"Love and Hatred","authors":"J. Haas, K. Vogt","doi":"10.4324/9781315645209-30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"disappeared from contemporary philosophical analysis, it did not disappear, of course, from everyday life and from relations within and between countries, religions, political parties, families, and so on. Why then do today’s ethicists not address hatred as love’s counterpart? In this paper, we offer an account of love’s and hatred’s role in motivation and of their respective normative status. Recent contributions argue that love supplies reasons: final reasons on one view, defeasible reasons on others. A plausible account, we agree, aims to capture love’s prominent role 2","PeriodicalId":413885,"journal":{"name":"The Routledge Handbook of Love in Philosophy","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Routledge Handbook of Love in Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315645209-30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

disappeared from contemporary philosophical analysis, it did not disappear, of course, from everyday life and from relations within and between countries, religions, political parties, families, and so on. Why then do today’s ethicists not address hatred as love’s counterpart? In this paper, we offer an account of love’s and hatred’s role in motivation and of their respective normative status. Recent contributions argue that love supplies reasons: final reasons on one view, defeasible reasons on others. A plausible account, we agree, aims to capture love’s prominent role 2
爱与恨
它从当代哲学分析中消失了,当然,它并没有从日常生活中消失,也没有从国家内部和国家之间的关系、宗教、政党、家庭等等中消失。那么,为什么今天的伦理学家不把仇恨当作爱的对应物呢?在本文中,我们提供了爱和恨在动机中的作用和它们各自的规范地位的说明。最近的研究认为,爱情提供了原因:一种观点认为是最终原因,另一种观点认为是可推翻的原因。我们同意,一个貌似合理的解释旨在抓住爱的突出作用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书