{"title":"Kant, Purity, and the Devil","authors":"Bysshe Inigo Coffey","doi":"10.3828/liverpool/9781800855380.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is in the Alastor volume of 1816 that Shelley’s quarrel with Wordsworth as a lost moral leader emerges for the first time. Chapter 5 turns to Peter Bell the Third, Shelley’s satire on Wordsworth, and relates the moral death-in-life of Peter Bell to Shelley’s revulsion against the wish to remain unchangeably as we are, as previously discussed in Chapter 2. This chapter revisits a question that has perplexed certain Shelley critics: did Shelley actually read Kant? The chapter supplies an answer to the question. Under the name of Bell, Wordsworth appears as a Kantian disciple corrupted by an ethical system that elevates, as the fundamental principle of moral action, duty above sympathy or the pursuit of happiness.","PeriodicalId":134914,"journal":{"name":"Shelley's Broken World","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shelley's Broken World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/liverpool/9781800855380.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
It is in the Alastor volume of 1816 that Shelley’s quarrel with Wordsworth as a lost moral leader emerges for the first time. Chapter 5 turns to Peter Bell the Third, Shelley’s satire on Wordsworth, and relates the moral death-in-life of Peter Bell to Shelley’s revulsion against the wish to remain unchangeably as we are, as previously discussed in Chapter 2. This chapter revisits a question that has perplexed certain Shelley critics: did Shelley actually read Kant? The chapter supplies an answer to the question. Under the name of Bell, Wordsworth appears as a Kantian disciple corrupted by an ethical system that elevates, as the fundamental principle of moral action, duty above sympathy or the pursuit of happiness.