The compatibility between optical coherence tomography and fundus fluorescein angiography in the detection of macular edema involving the fovea

B. Turgut, Selahattin Semih Aydogan
{"title":"The compatibility between optical coherence tomography and fundus fluorescein angiography in the detection of macular edema involving the fovea","authors":"B. Turgut, Selahattin Semih Aydogan","doi":"10.15406/aovs.2022.12.00422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To investigate the compatibility between optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) in the detection of macular edema (ME) excluding subretinal fluid (SRF) involving the fovea. Materials and methods: In this retrospective study in the Ophthalmology Department at our university hospital, interpretation of OCT and FFA images was performed for 200 eyes that underwent simultaneous FFA and OCT to rule out ME. The cases having SRF were excluded from the study. Results: Of 200 eyes, 193 eyes (96.5%) had the finding of ME confirmed by both techniques. There were 2 eyes (1%) for which FFA revealed ME involving fovea with hyperfluorescence in the macula while OCT demonstrated no intraretinal edema or subretinal fluid in the macula. For 5 eyes in the study (2.5%), OCT revealed intraretinal edema in the fovea, while these were not detected by FFA. Conclusion: This study suggests that FFA and OCT are highly sensitive techniques for the detection of ME and they correlate with each other. The little discrepancy between OCT and FFA for determining ME may be due to intracellular or extracellular edema and fast or slower development of retinal edema.","PeriodicalId":287670,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Ophthalmology & Visual System","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Ophthalmology & Visual System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/aovs.2022.12.00422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the compatibility between optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) in the detection of macular edema (ME) excluding subretinal fluid (SRF) involving the fovea. Materials and methods: In this retrospective study in the Ophthalmology Department at our university hospital, interpretation of OCT and FFA images was performed for 200 eyes that underwent simultaneous FFA and OCT to rule out ME. The cases having SRF were excluded from the study. Results: Of 200 eyes, 193 eyes (96.5%) had the finding of ME confirmed by both techniques. There were 2 eyes (1%) for which FFA revealed ME involving fovea with hyperfluorescence in the macula while OCT demonstrated no intraretinal edema or subretinal fluid in the macula. For 5 eyes in the study (2.5%), OCT revealed intraretinal edema in the fovea, while these were not detected by FFA. Conclusion: This study suggests that FFA and OCT are highly sensitive techniques for the detection of ME and they correlate with each other. The little discrepancy between OCT and FFA for determining ME may be due to intracellular or extracellular edema and fast or slower development of retinal edema.
光学相干断层扫描和眼底荧光素血管造影在检测累及中央窝的黄斑水肿中的相容性
目的:探讨光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和眼底荧光素血管造影(FFA)检测黄斑水肿(ME)的相容性,不包括视网膜下积液(SRF)累及中央窝。材料与方法:本研究在我校附属医院眼科进行回顾性研究,对同时行FFA和OCT的200只眼的OCT和FFA图像进行解读,以排除ME。有SRF的病例被排除在研究之外。结果:200只眼中,193只眼(96.5%)两种方法均证实了ME的发现。有2只眼(1%)FFA显示ME累及黄斑中央凹,伴有高荧光,而OCT未显示黄斑视网膜内水肿或视网膜下积液。研究中有5只眼(2.5%)OCT显示视网膜中央凹水肿,而FFA未检测到。结论:本研究提示FFA和OCT是检测ME的高灵敏度技术,且两者具有相关性。OCT和FFA测定ME差异小可能是由于细胞内或细胞外水肿以及视网膜水肿发展快或慢。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信