Investigation of a gambling approach to the subjective entropy test

ACM-SE 28 Pub Date : 1990-04-01 DOI:10.1145/98949.99133
Joel B. Davis
{"title":"Investigation of a gambling approach to the subjective entropy test","authors":"Joel B. Davis","doi":"10.1145/98949.99133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Researchers currently arc investigating a number of possible practical solutions for the problem of measuring program comprehension on a pragmatic level. Two well known tests arc the comprehension test and the Cloze lest [1], Perhaps less well known is the Subjective Entropy Test (SET) proposed by Zunde [2], This paper describes an investigation into a new version of SET called SETBET. We wished lo determine whether adding a betting scheme to the SET would change its performance. The conventional comprehension lest is probably the most intuitive of the tests. Such tests generally ask the subject to \"play computer\". For example, he is given a program and asked to determine what it does, or he is given a program containing a bug and asked to correct it. However, the problems with the comprehension test are that it is very time consuming lo prepare and that it re­ quires subjective grading. Because of these problems, other tests, such as the Cloze test, have been investigated. The Cloze lest consists of filling in missing parts in a program for which the respondent has to supply the correct word. One advantage of the Cloze lest over the comprchensi n type test is that the Cloze tests are simpler lo pre­ pare. Another advantage is grading, which can be totally objective if exact answers are required, or it can be some­ what more subjective if elements such as variable names can be changed. A problem with the Cloze test is that it is sensitive to bias and to the stimulus materials [3] and |1], Problems associated with this test motivated more re­ search. One result of the new research by Zunde [2] is a lest called SET.","PeriodicalId":409883,"journal":{"name":"ACM-SE 28","volume":"103 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM-SE 28","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/98949.99133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Researchers currently arc investigating a number of possible practical solutions for the problem of measuring program comprehension on a pragmatic level. Two well known tests arc the comprehension test and the Cloze lest [1], Perhaps less well known is the Subjective Entropy Test (SET) proposed by Zunde [2], This paper describes an investigation into a new version of SET called SETBET. We wished lo determine whether adding a betting scheme to the SET would change its performance. The conventional comprehension lest is probably the most intuitive of the tests. Such tests generally ask the subject to "play computer". For example, he is given a program and asked to determine what it does, or he is given a program containing a bug and asked to correct it. However, the problems with the comprehension test are that it is very time consuming lo prepare and that it re­ quires subjective grading. Because of these problems, other tests, such as the Cloze test, have been investigated. The Cloze lest consists of filling in missing parts in a program for which the respondent has to supply the correct word. One advantage of the Cloze lest over the comprchensi n type test is that the Cloze tests are simpler lo pre­ pare. Another advantage is grading, which can be totally objective if exact answers are required, or it can be some­ what more subjective if elements such as variable names can be changed. A problem with the Cloze test is that it is sensitive to bias and to the stimulus materials [3] and |1], Problems associated with this test motivated more re­ search. One result of the new research by Zunde [2] is a lest called SET.
主观熵检验的赌博方法研究
研究人员目前正在研究一些可能的实际解决方案,以在实用水平上衡量程序理解的问题。两个众所周知的测试是理解测试和完形填空测试[1],也许不太为人所知的是Zunde[2]提出的主观熵测试(SET),本文描述了对一个名为SETBET的新版本的调查。我们希望确定向SET添加投注方案是否会改变其性能。传统的理解测试可能是最直观的测试。这类测试通常要求受试者“玩电脑”。例如,给他一个程序并要求他确定它是做什么的,或者给他一个包含错误的程序并要求他纠正它。然而,理解测试的问题在于它的准备非常耗时,而且需要主观评分。由于这些问题,人们研究了其他测试,如完形填空测试。完形填空题包括填空部分,答题者必须提供正确的单词。完形填空相对于填空型测验的一个优点是,完形填空测验比准备题更简单。另一个优点是评分,如果需要准确的答案,评分可以是完全客观的,或者如果变量名等元素可以更改,评分可以是更主观的。完形填空测试的一个问题是它对偏见和刺激材料很敏感[3]和[1],与此相关的问题激发了更多的研究。Zunde[2]的新研究成果之一是一个名为SET的最小值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信