Penetrating Injury from Interpersonal Violence and Related Haemorrhagic Shock Resuscitation Practices in An Urban South African Emergency Medical Service

M. Zalgaonker, N. Naidoo, L. Christopher
{"title":"Penetrating Injury from Interpersonal Violence and Related Haemorrhagic Shock Resuscitation Practices in An Urban South African Emergency Medical Service","authors":"M. Zalgaonker, N. Naidoo, L. Christopher","doi":"10.33151/ajp.18.873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Physical injury is a major cause of premature death and/or disability worldwide. South African mortality statistics indicate approximately half of all injury-related deaths were intentional, often from sharp-force injuries. Injury surveillance data for victims of penetrating injury is scarce in low- to middle-income countries with a reliance on mortality data. The aim was to provide an epidemiological description of penetrating injury and the related haemorrhagic shock resuscitation practice in a South African emergency medical service. Methods A prospective, observational, descriptive study was conducted in urban Cape Town. ‘R’ statistical computing was used. Emergency care providers voluntarily documented parameters for mechanism of injury, vital signs, intravenous fluid resuscitation and demographic information for patients with penetrating injury. Results Of 2884 (N) penetrating trauma cases, 143 (n) cases were sampled from providers. The chest (35.7%) and upper-limbs (31.5%) were the most common anatomy for penetrating injuries. The estimated mean crystalloid fluid volume administered for penetrating abdominal and chest injuries was 1010.6 mL and 925.3 mL respectively. A statistically significant association was observed between fluid administration and clinical indications such as systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, capillary refill time, level of consciousness estimation from the scene of the incident to the hospital after intravenous fluid administration. Most emergency medical service call outs (56%) were likely to occur between 20:00 and 02:00. Conclusion The intravenous fluid management by pre-hospital emergency care providers for patients with penetrating traumatic injuries, do not cohere with hypotensive resuscitative recommendations. Future research must include clinical practice guideline implementation efficacy and pre-hospital surveillance mechanisms. This study informs hospital clinician expectations for penetrating trauma care by pre-hospital providers.","PeriodicalId":340334,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Paramedicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Paramedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33151/ajp.18.873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Physical injury is a major cause of premature death and/or disability worldwide. South African mortality statistics indicate approximately half of all injury-related deaths were intentional, often from sharp-force injuries. Injury surveillance data for victims of penetrating injury is scarce in low- to middle-income countries with a reliance on mortality data. The aim was to provide an epidemiological description of penetrating injury and the related haemorrhagic shock resuscitation practice in a South African emergency medical service. Methods A prospective, observational, descriptive study was conducted in urban Cape Town. ‘R’ statistical computing was used. Emergency care providers voluntarily documented parameters for mechanism of injury, vital signs, intravenous fluid resuscitation and demographic information for patients with penetrating injury. Results Of 2884 (N) penetrating trauma cases, 143 (n) cases were sampled from providers. The chest (35.7%) and upper-limbs (31.5%) were the most common anatomy for penetrating injuries. The estimated mean crystalloid fluid volume administered for penetrating abdominal and chest injuries was 1010.6 mL and 925.3 mL respectively. A statistically significant association was observed between fluid administration and clinical indications such as systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, capillary refill time, level of consciousness estimation from the scene of the incident to the hospital after intravenous fluid administration. Most emergency medical service call outs (56%) were likely to occur between 20:00 and 02:00. Conclusion The intravenous fluid management by pre-hospital emergency care providers for patients with penetrating traumatic injuries, do not cohere with hypotensive resuscitative recommendations. Future research must include clinical practice guideline implementation efficacy and pre-hospital surveillance mechanisms. This study informs hospital clinician expectations for penetrating trauma care by pre-hospital providers.
南非城市紧急医疗服务中人际暴力造成的穿透性伤害和相关的失血性休克复苏实践
身体伤害是世界范围内过早死亡和/或残疾的一个主要原因。南非的死亡率统计数字表明,在所有与伤害有关的死亡中,约有一半是故意的,通常是由利器造成的。在低收入和中等收入国家,穿透伤受害者的伤害监测数据很少,主要依赖于死亡率数据。目的是提供南非紧急医疗服务部门穿透伤的流行病学描述和相关的失血性休克复苏做法。方法在开普敦市区进行前瞻性、观察性、描述性研究。采用“R”统计计算。急救人员自愿记录了穿透伤患者的损伤机制、生命体征、静脉输液复苏和人口统计信息。结果2884例(N例)穿透性创伤病例中,143例(N例)来自供方。胸部(35.7%)和上肢(31.5%)是穿透伤最常见的解剖部位。估计穿透性腹部和胸部损伤的平均晶体液体体积分别为1010.6 mL和925.3 mL。静脉输液与临床指征(如收缩压和舒张压、心率、毛细血管再充血时间、从事故现场到医院的意识水平评估)之间存在统计学上显著的关联。大多数紧急医疗服务呼叫(56%)可能发生在20:00至02:00之间。结论院前急救人员对穿透性创伤患者的静脉输液管理不符合低血压复苏的建议。未来的研究必须包括临床实践指南的实施效果和院前监测机制。本研究告知医院临床医生对院前提供穿透性创伤护理的期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信