Cross-company and single-company effort models using the ISBSG database: a further replicated study

C. Lokan, E. Mendes
{"title":"Cross-company and single-company effort models using the ISBSG database: a further replicated study","authors":"C. Lokan, E. Mendes","doi":"10.1145/1159733.1159747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Five years ago the ISBSG database was used by Jeffery et al. [6] (S1) to compare the effort prediction accuracy between cross- and single-company effort models. Given that more than 2,000 projects were later volunteered to this database, in 2005 Mendes et al. [17] (S2) replicated S1 but obtained different results. The difference in results between both studies could have resulted from legitimate differences in data set patterns but also could have been influenced by differences in experimental procedure. S2 was unable to employ exactly the same experimental procedure used in S1, as S1's procedure was not fully documented. Therefore this paper aimed to apply S2's experimental procedure to the ISBSG database version used in S1 (release 6) to assess if differences in experimental procedure would have contributed towards different results. Our results corroborated those from S1: we found that predictions based on a single-company model were significantly more accurate than those based on a cross-company model.","PeriodicalId":201305,"journal":{"name":"International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"59","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1159733.1159747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 59

Abstract

Five years ago the ISBSG database was used by Jeffery et al. [6] (S1) to compare the effort prediction accuracy between cross- and single-company effort models. Given that more than 2,000 projects were later volunteered to this database, in 2005 Mendes et al. [17] (S2) replicated S1 but obtained different results. The difference in results between both studies could have resulted from legitimate differences in data set patterns but also could have been influenced by differences in experimental procedure. S2 was unable to employ exactly the same experimental procedure used in S1, as S1's procedure was not fully documented. Therefore this paper aimed to apply S2's experimental procedure to the ISBSG database version used in S1 (release 6) to assess if differences in experimental procedure would have contributed towards different results. Our results corroborated those from S1: we found that predictions based on a single-company model were significantly more accurate than those based on a cross-company model.
使用ISBSG数据库的跨公司和单公司工作模型:进一步的复制研究
五年前,Jeffery等人[6](S1)使用ISBSG数据库来比较跨公司和单公司努力模型之间的努力预测精度。考虑到后来有2000多个项目自愿加入该数据库,2005年Mendes等[17](S2)复制了S1,但得到了不同的结果。两项研究结果的差异可能是由于数据集模式的合理差异造成的,但也可能受到实验程序差异的影响。S2无法采用与S1完全相同的实验程序,因为S1的程序没有完整的记录。因此,本文旨在将S2的实验程序应用于S1使用的ISBSG数据库版本(第6版),以评估实验程序的差异是否会导致不同的结果。我们的结果证实了S1的结论:我们发现基于单一公司模型的预测比基于跨公司模型的预测要准确得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信