Low-osmolality versus high-osmolality contrast material.

Current opinion in radiology Pub Date : 1992-04-01
W T Korn, M A Bettmann
{"title":"Low-osmolality versus high-osmolality contrast material.","authors":"W T Korn,&nbsp;M A Bettmann","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Universal use of low-osmolality contrast agents for intravascular diagnostic procedures has been limited to a large extent by the high cost of these agents, which is generally 10 to 20 times that of high-osmolality contrast media. The question for the radiologist, therefore, is the definition of selected populations and situations for the use of low-osmolality agents to achieve the greatest patient benefit at the least cost. The authors examine controversial issues including the incidence of significant contrast reactions, the definition and incidence of nephrotoxicity, and the effects of contrast media on coagulability.</p>","PeriodicalId":77090,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in radiology","volume":"4 2","pages":"9-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Universal use of low-osmolality contrast agents for intravascular diagnostic procedures has been limited to a large extent by the high cost of these agents, which is generally 10 to 20 times that of high-osmolality contrast media. The question for the radiologist, therefore, is the definition of selected populations and situations for the use of low-osmolality agents to achieve the greatest patient benefit at the least cost. The authors examine controversial issues including the incidence of significant contrast reactions, the definition and incidence of nephrotoxicity, and the effects of contrast media on coagulability.

低渗透压对比高渗透压对比材料。
低渗透压造影剂在血管内诊断过程中的普遍应用在很大程度上受到这些造影剂的高成本的限制,其成本通常是高渗透压造影剂的10至20倍。因此,放射科医生面临的问题是,如何在选定人群和情况下使用低渗透压药物,以最小的成本获得最大的患者效益。作者研究了有争议的问题,包括显著造影剂反应的发生率,肾毒性的定义和发生率,造影剂对凝血性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信