PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TAHAPAN PEMILIHAN UMUM KEPALA DAERAH DAN WAKIL KEPALA DAERAH MELALUI PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA

Jabaruddin Jabaruddin
{"title":"PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TAHAPAN PEMILIHAN UMUM KEPALA DAERAH DAN WAKIL KEPALA DAERAH MELALUI PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA","authors":"Jabaruddin Jabaruddin","doi":"10.47353/delarev.v1i1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Settlement of disputes in regional head elections through the Lawsuit of the State Administrative Court is an appropriate legal action because the State administrative court has the authority to decide and adjudicate on stage disputes as regulated in the Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) Number 07 of 2010 and legal consequences The decision of the Administrative Court in a dispute at the stage of the regional head and deputy regional head election to the election stages that have been carried out cannot be carried out by the KPU because the election has been completed on November 4, 2010. In addition, the State administrative decision does not have executive power because The only one authorized to participate in the plaintiff's election is the KPU, especially in the decision of the panel of judges at the Kendari State Administrative Court not to order the Southeast Sulawesi Provincial KPU to stop or cancel the ongoing stages and this is in line with the M's decision. the Constitutional Court which won the defendant in this case the Provincial KPU as the executor in this case the Central KPU commissioner. ","PeriodicalId":135172,"journal":{"name":"Lakidende Law Review","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lakidende Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47353/delarev.v1i1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Settlement of disputes in regional head elections through the Lawsuit of the State Administrative Court is an appropriate legal action because the State administrative court has the authority to decide and adjudicate on stage disputes as regulated in the Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) Number 07 of 2010 and legal consequences The decision of the Administrative Court in a dispute at the stage of the regional head and deputy regional head election to the election stages that have been carried out cannot be carried out by the KPU because the election has been completed on November 4, 2010. In addition, the State administrative decision does not have executive power because The only one authorized to participate in the plaintiff's election is the KPU, especially in the decision of the panel of judges at the Kendari State Administrative Court not to order the Southeast Sulawesi Provincial KPU to stop or cancel the ongoing stages and this is in line with the M's decision. the Constitutional Court which won the defendant in this case the Provincial KPU as the executor in this case the Central KPU commissioner. 
通过州行政法院解决选举期间的争端
解决争端的地区主管选举中通过国家行政法院的诉讼是一个适当的法律行动,因为国家行政法院有权决定和裁决在舞台上纠纷按照规定在最高法院通函(某)2010年07和法律后果的决定行政法院在纠纷阶段的地区主管和副地区主管选举的选举阶段由于选举已于2010年11月4日结束,因此不能由KPU进行。此外,国家行政决定不具有行政权,因为唯一被授权参与原告选举的是KPU,特别是Kendari国家行政法院的法官小组决定不命令东南苏拉威西省KPU停止或取消正在进行的阶段,这与M的决定是一致的。宪法法院在这个案件中赢得了被告,在这个案件中,省级KPU作为执行人,中央KPU专员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信