“Yeah, I wrote that!”: Incorporating critical information literacy to build community inside and outside of Wikipedia

Kristina M. De Voe, A. Shaw
{"title":"“Yeah, I wrote that!”: Incorporating critical information literacy to build community inside and outside of Wikipedia","authors":"Kristina M. De Voe, A. Shaw","doi":"10.3998/mpub.11778416.ch2.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this chapter, we examine the relationship between open pedagogical practices and critical information literacy and how they intersect when Wikipedia is introduced in the classroom. Specifically, we discuss the collaboration between a librarian and a course instructor on iterations of Wikipedia assignments across three years and two classes. We unpack the importance of existing infrastructures, such as edit-a-thons and the WikiEdu dashboard, to support bringing Wikipedia assignments into the classroom. We also explore how we worked to connect course content to the renewable assignments and brought larger discussions of representation and community on Wikipedia into the classroom and assignments. Finally, we outline the lessons we learned through this collaboration. In sum, scaffolded projects allowed students to practice their contributions to Wikipedia in a supportive space and fostered critical engagement with course content. In their end-of-semester reflections, students stated that contributing to Wikipedia felt more meaningful and elicited feelings of pride that traditional, disposable assessments did not. They saw themselves as knowledge creators and scholarship creation as part of an ongoing conversation rather than an “end product.” By engaging in peer-review assignments, participating in edit-a-thons, and discussing the assignments with librarians who were not their professors, students also saw their work as part of a broader academic conversation. Through Wikipedia assignments, students can appreciate their own information privilege in terms of access to costly resources and become proactive in sharing that knowledge and their own growing expertise with a wider public.","PeriodicalId":142704,"journal":{"name":"Wikipedia and Academic Libraries","volume":"09 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wikipedia and Academic Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.11778416.ch2.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this chapter, we examine the relationship between open pedagogical practices and critical information literacy and how they intersect when Wikipedia is introduced in the classroom. Specifically, we discuss the collaboration between a librarian and a course instructor on iterations of Wikipedia assignments across three years and two classes. We unpack the importance of existing infrastructures, such as edit-a-thons and the WikiEdu dashboard, to support bringing Wikipedia assignments into the classroom. We also explore how we worked to connect course content to the renewable assignments and brought larger discussions of representation and community on Wikipedia into the classroom and assignments. Finally, we outline the lessons we learned through this collaboration. In sum, scaffolded projects allowed students to practice their contributions to Wikipedia in a supportive space and fostered critical engagement with course content. In their end-of-semester reflections, students stated that contributing to Wikipedia felt more meaningful and elicited feelings of pride that traditional, disposable assessments did not. They saw themselves as knowledge creators and scholarship creation as part of an ongoing conversation rather than an “end product.” By engaging in peer-review assignments, participating in edit-a-thons, and discussing the assignments with librarians who were not their professors, students also saw their work as part of a broader academic conversation. Through Wikipedia assignments, students can appreciate their own information privilege in terms of access to costly resources and become proactive in sharing that knowledge and their own growing expertise with a wider public.
“是的,那是我写的!”:结合关键信息素养,在维基百科内外建立社区
在本章中,我们研究了开放教学实践与批判性信息素养之间的关系,以及当维基百科被引入课堂时,它们是如何相交的。具体地说,我们将讨论图书管理员和课程讲师之间的合作,讨论跨越三年和两节课的维基百科作业的迭代。我们揭示了现有基础设施的重要性,例如编辑马拉松和WikiEdu仪表盘,以支持将维基百科作业带入课堂。我们还探讨了如何将课程内容与可更新的作业联系起来,并将维基百科上的代表性和社区的更大讨论带入课堂和作业。最后,我们概述了我们从这次合作中学到的教训。总而言之,脚手架式项目允许学生在一个支持性的空间里练习他们对维基百科的贡献,并培养对课程内容的批判性参与。在学期末的反思中,学生们表示,与传统的一次性评估相比,为维基百科做贡献感觉更有意义,更能激发自豪感。他们将自己视为知识创造者和学术创造者,并将其视为持续对话的一部分,而不是“最终产品”。通过参与同行评议作业,参与编辑马拉松,以及与图书馆员(不是他们的教授)讨论作业,学生们也将自己的工作视为更广泛的学术对话的一部分。通过维基百科的作业,学生们可以欣赏自己在获取昂贵资源方面的信息特权,并积极主动地与更广泛的公众分享这些知识和他们自己不断增长的专业知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信