Powerpoint: Bankruptcy Immunities, Transparency, and Capital Structure

M. Simkovic
{"title":"Powerpoint: Bankruptcy Immunities, Transparency, and Capital Structure","authors":"M. Simkovic","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1738539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summarizes and further develops themes from \"Secret Liens and the Financial Crisis of 2008\".Secret Liens:This article explains the roots of financial crises in one of the oldest and most fundamental problems of commercial law: hidden leverage. Common law courts wrestled with this problem for centuries and developed a time - tested solution: the doctrine of secret liens. If the debtor becomes insolvent, the doctrine of secret liens punishes secret lien holders by subordinating their claims to those of other creditors. In other words, by overriding privately negotiated payment priorities, the doctrine of secret liens creates incentives for transparency. This article argues that legal changes over the last 80 years eroded the doctrine of secret liens, and thereby led to the financial crisis. Due to these legal changes, complex and opaque financial products received the highest priority in bankruptcy, and creditors' incentives were therefore to structure transactions using these favored financial products. The opaque credit environment that resulted permitted debtors - particularly investment banks - to hide the extent of their leverage, to the detriment of all creditors. This article argues that Congress can prevent future financial crises by restoring the doctrine of secret liens, or by adopting a modernized regulatory regime built on the doctrine of secret liens' fundamental insight - that creditors should be compelled to disclose their claims in exchange for payment priority.Additional information:The powerpoint presentation documents specific real world events which bear out the \"secret liens\" theory, including mischaracterization of Repo transactions as Lehman Brothers, Citibank, and Bank of America, and the use of currency and interest rate swaps by Greece and Italy to hide their debts. The powerpoint also shows different estimates of taxpayer losses from the AIG bailout.","PeriodicalId":340291,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Intertemporal Firm Choice & Growth","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Intertemporal Firm Choice & Growth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1738539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Summarizes and further develops themes from "Secret Liens and the Financial Crisis of 2008".Secret Liens:This article explains the roots of financial crises in one of the oldest and most fundamental problems of commercial law: hidden leverage. Common law courts wrestled with this problem for centuries and developed a time - tested solution: the doctrine of secret liens. If the debtor becomes insolvent, the doctrine of secret liens punishes secret lien holders by subordinating their claims to those of other creditors. In other words, by overriding privately negotiated payment priorities, the doctrine of secret liens creates incentives for transparency. This article argues that legal changes over the last 80 years eroded the doctrine of secret liens, and thereby led to the financial crisis. Due to these legal changes, complex and opaque financial products received the highest priority in bankruptcy, and creditors' incentives were therefore to structure transactions using these favored financial products. The opaque credit environment that resulted permitted debtors - particularly investment banks - to hide the extent of their leverage, to the detriment of all creditors. This article argues that Congress can prevent future financial crises by restoring the doctrine of secret liens, or by adopting a modernized regulatory regime built on the doctrine of secret liens' fundamental insight - that creditors should be compelled to disclose their claims in exchange for payment priority.Additional information:The powerpoint presentation documents specific real world events which bear out the "secret liens" theory, including mischaracterization of Repo transactions as Lehman Brothers, Citibank, and Bank of America, and the use of currency and interest rate swaps by Greece and Italy to hide their debts. The powerpoint also shows different estimates of taxpayer losses from the AIG bailout.
ppt:破产豁免、透明度和资本结构
总结并进一步发展了“秘密留置权与2008年金融危机”的主题。秘密留置权:本文从商业法中最古老、最基本的问题之一——隐性杠杆——来解释金融危机的根源。几个世纪以来,普通法法院一直在努力解决这个问题,并发展出一种久经考验的解决方案:秘密留置权原则。如果债务人破产,秘密留置权原则惩罚秘密留置权持有人,使他们的债权服从于其他债权人的债权。换句话说,秘密留置权原则凌驾于私下协商的付款优先顺序之上,为透明度创造了动力。本文认为,过去80年的法律变化侵蚀了秘密留置权原则,从而导致了金融危机。由于这些法律变化,复杂和不透明的金融产品在破产中获得了最高优先权,因此债权人的动机是使用这些受青睐的金融产品来构建交易。由此导致的不透明信贷环境,使得债务人——尤其是投资银行——得以隐瞒自己的杠杆程度,从而损害了所有债权人的利益。本文认为,国会可以通过恢复秘密留置权原则,或通过采用建立在秘密留置权原则基本见解基础上的现代化监管制度——债权人应被迫披露其债权,以换取优先付款——来防止未来的金融危机。附加信息:该演示文稿记录了具体的现实世界事件,这些事件证实了“秘密留置权”理论,包括将回购交易错误地描述为雷曼兄弟、花旗银行和美国银行,以及希腊和意大利使用货币和利率互换来隐藏其债务。ppt还显示了对美国国际集团(AIG)救助计划中纳税人损失的不同估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信