Two slice-EM algorithms for fitting generalized linear mixed models with binary response

F. Vaida, X. Meng
{"title":"Two slice-EM algorithms for fitting generalized linear mixed models with binary response","authors":"F. Vaida, X. Meng","doi":"10.1191/1471082X05st097oa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The celebrated simplicity of the EM algorithm is somewhat lost in its common use for generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) because of its analytically intractable E-step. A natural and typical strategy in practice is to implement the E-step via Monte Carlo by drawing the unobserved random effects from their conditional distribution as specified by the E-step. In this paper, we show that further augmenting the missing data (e.g., the random effects) used by the M-step leads to a quite attractive and general slice sampler for implementing the Monte Carlo E-step. The slice sampler scheme is straightforward to implement, and it is neither restricted to the particular choice of the link function (e.g., probit) nor to the distribution of the random effects (e.g., normal). We apply this scheme to the standard EM algorithm as well as to an alternative EM algorithm which treats the variance-standardized random effects, rather than the random effects themselves, as missing data. The alternative EM algorithm does not only have faster convergence, but also leads to generalized linear model-like variance estimation, because it converts the random-effect standard deviations into linear regression parameters. Using the well-known salamander mating problem, we compare these two algorithms with each other, as well as with a variety of methods given in the literature in terms of the resulting point and interval estimates.","PeriodicalId":354759,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Modeling","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Modeling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1191/1471082X05st097oa","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

The celebrated simplicity of the EM algorithm is somewhat lost in its common use for generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) because of its analytically intractable E-step. A natural and typical strategy in practice is to implement the E-step via Monte Carlo by drawing the unobserved random effects from their conditional distribution as specified by the E-step. In this paper, we show that further augmenting the missing data (e.g., the random effects) used by the M-step leads to a quite attractive and general slice sampler for implementing the Monte Carlo E-step. The slice sampler scheme is straightforward to implement, and it is neither restricted to the particular choice of the link function (e.g., probit) nor to the distribution of the random effects (e.g., normal). We apply this scheme to the standard EM algorithm as well as to an alternative EM algorithm which treats the variance-standardized random effects, rather than the random effects themselves, as missing data. The alternative EM algorithm does not only have faster convergence, but also leads to generalized linear model-like variance estimation, because it converts the random-effect standard deviations into linear regression parameters. Using the well-known salamander mating problem, we compare these two algorithms with each other, as well as with a variety of methods given in the literature in terms of the resulting point and interval estimates.
具有二元响应的广义线性混合模型的两种切片em拟合算法
EM算法的简单性在一般的广义线性混合模型(glmm)中由于其难以解析的e步而有所丧失。在实践中,一种自然而典型的策略是通过蒙特卡罗方法实现e步,即从e步指定的条件分布中绘制未观察到的随机效应。在本文中,我们表明,进一步扩大m步所使用的缺失数据(例如,随机效应)会导致一个相当有吸引力的和通用的切片采样器,用于实现蒙特卡洛e步。切片采样器方案很容易实现,它既不局限于链接函数的特定选择(例如,probit),也不局限于随机效应的分布(例如,正态)。我们将该方案应用于标准的EM算法以及一种替代的EM算法,该算法将方差标准化的随机效应而不是随机效应本身作为缺失数据。替代EM算法不仅具有更快的收敛速度,而且由于将随机效应标准差转换为线性回归参数,导致了广义线性类模型方差估计。利用众所周知的蝾螈交配问题,我们将这两种算法相互比较,并与文献中给出的各种方法在结果点和区间估计方面进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信