The "Budget-Maximizing Bureaucrat" Around The World: The Budgetary Preferences Of Public Employees Across Countries

Michael Bednarczuk
{"title":"The \"Budget-Maximizing Bureaucrat\" Around The World: The Budgetary Preferences Of Public Employees Across Countries","authors":"Michael Bednarczuk","doi":"10.37808/pfm.21.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Are bureaucrats \"budget-maximizers\"? There has been mixed support for this argument. Furthermore, these different results tend to be clustered by geography. Is there a country-specific dimension to this theory? This article addresses these contradictory findings by modeling both the individual-level budget preferences of bureaucrats while also accounting for country-level political and economic variables. It is hypothesized that those public servants in bureaus directly impacted by increases in spending should want more government spending than those who are not. Additionally, bureaucrats should have no uniform preference for spending on government transfer payments. While the economic and political contexts of the countries also impacted preferences, hierarchical random intercept models using data from the International Social Survey Program in almost two dozen countries found robust support for the hypotheses. These results support the notion that bureaucrats are budget-maximizers, but that this behavior is largely confined to their specific bureau; furthermore, this article finds international support for these hypotheses.","PeriodicalId":118612,"journal":{"name":"Public Finance and Management","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Finance and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37808/pfm.21.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Are bureaucrats "budget-maximizers"? There has been mixed support for this argument. Furthermore, these different results tend to be clustered by geography. Is there a country-specific dimension to this theory? This article addresses these contradictory findings by modeling both the individual-level budget preferences of bureaucrats while also accounting for country-level political and economic variables. It is hypothesized that those public servants in bureaus directly impacted by increases in spending should want more government spending than those who are not. Additionally, bureaucrats should have no uniform preference for spending on government transfer payments. While the economic and political contexts of the countries also impacted preferences, hierarchical random intercept models using data from the International Social Survey Program in almost two dozen countries found robust support for the hypotheses. These results support the notion that bureaucrats are budget-maximizers, but that this behavior is largely confined to their specific bureau; furthermore, this article finds international support for these hypotheses.
世界范围内的“预算最大化官僚”:各国公共雇员的预算偏好
官僚是“预算最大化者”吗?对这一观点的支持褒贬不一。此外,这些不同的结果往往按地理位置聚集在一起。这一理论是否有特定国家的维度?本文通过对官僚的个人预算偏好建模,同时考虑国家层面的政治和经济变量,解决了这些矛盾的发现。据推测,那些直接受到支出增加影响的公务员应该比那些没有受到影响的公务员更需要政府支出。此外,官僚们不应该对政府转移支付支出有统一的偏好。虽然这些国家的经济和政治背景也会影响人们的偏好,但利用国际社会调查项目(International Social Survey Program)在近24个国家的数据建立的分层随机截取模型发现,这些假设得到了有力的支持。这些结果支持了这样一种观点,即官僚是预算最大化者,但这种行为在很大程度上仅限于他们所在的特定部门;此外,本文还为这些假设找到了国际支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信