Demographic challenges of Europe in the new millennium: Swedish family policies as an answer to them?

Livia Sz. Oláh
{"title":"Demographic challenges of Europe in the new millennium: Swedish family policies as an answer to them?","authors":"Livia Sz. Oláh","doi":"10.4337/9781839106118.00010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Welfare states have changed greatly in the past few decades, manifested in retrenchment, deregulations and reduced state engagement in traditional social protection, unlike the Golden Age of Welfare in the mid 1940s to mid 1970s (Palier 2010; Wincott 2013). Back then, based on the dominant family structure of the mid twentieth century, social policies targeted the male breadwinner with an industrial job. Indeed, the rationale of the post-war welfare state was to protect men as providers, and thus their families, against the risk of welfare losses when not being able to work for pay due to illness, unemployment or old age. Women could uphold a decent living standard in the face of these old social risks via stable marriage (and upon widowhood) as they were expected to ‘de-commodify’; that is, to give up work when entering marriage or having the first child (Bonoli 2007; Orloff 1993). The implicit gender contracts of the ‘housewife era’ relegated women to unpaid work in the family, and made their welfare, social and economic status dependent on that of their husbands (Pateman 1988). From the 1970s onwards, however, post-industrial transformations have increasingly come to characterise advanced societies. Deindustrialisation and tertiarisation of employment resulted in changing labour markets attracting large masses of women into the labour force. These developments coincided with increasing destandardisation of employment, career interruptions and deregularisation of full-time and standard work contracts, creating new social and economic risks for families (Bonoli 2007; Charles 2005). The Nordic and the English-speaking countries were among the first to enter the post-industrial stage of economic development. Continental and Southern European societies followed this path with a delay of two to three decades. In the 1990s and early 2000s, Central-Eastern Europe, including the Baltic countries, were to handle","PeriodicalId":173312,"journal":{"name":"Challenges to the Welfare State","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Challenges to the Welfare State","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839106118.00010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Welfare states have changed greatly in the past few decades, manifested in retrenchment, deregulations and reduced state engagement in traditional social protection, unlike the Golden Age of Welfare in the mid 1940s to mid 1970s (Palier 2010; Wincott 2013). Back then, based on the dominant family structure of the mid twentieth century, social policies targeted the male breadwinner with an industrial job. Indeed, the rationale of the post-war welfare state was to protect men as providers, and thus their families, against the risk of welfare losses when not being able to work for pay due to illness, unemployment or old age. Women could uphold a decent living standard in the face of these old social risks via stable marriage (and upon widowhood) as they were expected to ‘de-commodify’; that is, to give up work when entering marriage or having the first child (Bonoli 2007; Orloff 1993). The implicit gender contracts of the ‘housewife era’ relegated women to unpaid work in the family, and made their welfare, social and economic status dependent on that of their husbands (Pateman 1988). From the 1970s onwards, however, post-industrial transformations have increasingly come to characterise advanced societies. Deindustrialisation and tertiarisation of employment resulted in changing labour markets attracting large masses of women into the labour force. These developments coincided with increasing destandardisation of employment, career interruptions and deregularisation of full-time and standard work contracts, creating new social and economic risks for families (Bonoli 2007; Charles 2005). The Nordic and the English-speaking countries were among the first to enter the post-industrial stage of economic development. Continental and Southern European societies followed this path with a delay of two to three decades. In the 1990s and early 2000s, Central-Eastern Europe, including the Baltic countries, were to handle
新千年欧洲的人口挑战:瑞典的家庭政策是应对这些挑战的答案吗?
福利国家在过去几十年中发生了巨大变化,表现为紧缩、放松管制和减少国家对传统社会保护的参与,这与20世纪40年代中期至70年代中期的福利黄金时代不同(Palier 2010;Wincott 2013)。当时,基于20世纪中期占主导地位的家庭结构,社会政策的目标是从事工业工作的男性养家糊口。事实上,战后福利国家的基本原理是保护作为供养者的男性,以及他们的家庭,避免因疾病、失业或年老而无法工作而失去福利的风险。面对这些旧的社会风险,妇女可以通过稳定的婚姻(以及守寡)维持体面的生活水平,因为她们被期望“去商品化”;即在结婚或生第一个孩子时放弃工作(Bonoli 2007;Orloff 1993)。在“家庭主妇时代”,隐性的性别契约迫使女性在家庭中从事无报酬的工作,并使她们的福利、社会和经济地位依赖于丈夫的福利、社会和经济地位(Pateman 1988)。然而,从20世纪70年代开始,后工业转型日益成为发达社会的特征。去工业化和就业三级化导致劳动力市场发生变化,吸引大批妇女加入劳动力队伍。这些发展与就业的非标准化、职业中断和全职和标准工作合同的非规范化相吻合,给家庭带来了新的社会和经济风险(Bonoli 2007;查尔斯·2005)。北欧和英语国家是最先进入后工业经济发展阶段的国家之一。欧洲大陆和南欧社会沿着这条道路走了二、三十年。在20世纪90年代和21世纪初,中欧和东欧,包括波罗的海国家,都在处理
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信