Analysing the Performance of LSTMs and CNNs on 1310 nm Laser Data for Fingerprint Presentation Attack Detection

Jascha Kolberg, Alexandru-Cosmin Vasile, M. Gomez-Barrero, C. Busch
{"title":"Analysing the Performance of LSTMs and CNNs on 1310 nm Laser Data for Fingerprint Presentation Attack Detection","authors":"Jascha Kolberg, Alexandru-Cosmin Vasile, M. Gomez-Barrero, C. Busch","doi":"10.1109/IJCB48548.2020.9304888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the wide operational deployment of biometric recognition systems, presentation attacks targeting the capture device have become a severe threat. Especially for fingerprint recognition, a high number of different materials allows the creation of numerous presentation attack instruments (PAIs) in the form of full fake fingers and fingerprint overlays, which very much resemble the skin properties at fingertips. As a consequence, automated presentation attack detection (PAD) mechanisms are of utmost importance. Utilising a 1310 nm laser in a new capture device, we present an evaluation of three long short-term memory (LSTM) networks in comparison to eight convolutional neural networks (CNNs) on a database comprising over 22,000 samples and including 45 different PAI species. The LSTMs analyse temporal properties within a captured sequence in order to detect blood movement, while the CNNs take into account spatial properties within a single frame to focus on reflections by the PAI material. The results show that the diversity of PAI species is too big for a single classifier to correctly detect all presentation attacks. However, by fusing the scores from distinct algorithms, we can achieve a detection accuracy of 3.71% APCER for a convenient BPCER of 0.2%.","PeriodicalId":417270,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCB48548.2020.9304888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Due to the wide operational deployment of biometric recognition systems, presentation attacks targeting the capture device have become a severe threat. Especially for fingerprint recognition, a high number of different materials allows the creation of numerous presentation attack instruments (PAIs) in the form of full fake fingers and fingerprint overlays, which very much resemble the skin properties at fingertips. As a consequence, automated presentation attack detection (PAD) mechanisms are of utmost importance. Utilising a 1310 nm laser in a new capture device, we present an evaluation of three long short-term memory (LSTM) networks in comparison to eight convolutional neural networks (CNNs) on a database comprising over 22,000 samples and including 45 different PAI species. The LSTMs analyse temporal properties within a captured sequence in order to detect blood movement, while the CNNs take into account spatial properties within a single frame to focus on reflections by the PAI material. The results show that the diversity of PAI species is too big for a single classifier to correctly detect all presentation attacks. However, by fusing the scores from distinct algorithms, we can achieve a detection accuracy of 3.71% APCER for a convenient BPCER of 0.2%.
lstm和cnn在1310nm激光指纹呈现攻击检测中的性能分析
由于生物特征识别系统的广泛应用,针对捕获设备的呈现攻击已成为一种严重的威胁。特别是对于指纹识别,大量不同的材料允许以完整的假手指和指纹覆盖的形式创建许多呈现攻击工具(PAIs),这非常类似于指尖的皮肤属性。因此,自动表示攻击检测(PAD)机制至关重要。在新的捕获装置中使用1310 nm激光,我们在包含超过22,000个样本的数据库上对三个长短期记忆(LSTM)网络进行了评估,并与八个卷积神经网络(cnn)进行了比较。lstm分析捕获序列中的时间属性以检测血液运动,而cnn考虑单帧内的空间属性以聚焦PAI材料的反射。结果表明,PAI物种的多样性太大,单个分类器无法正确检测所有表示攻击。然而,通过融合不同算法的分数,我们可以实现3.71%的APCER检测精度,而方便的BPCER为0.2%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信