Reimagining Semiotics in Communication

P. Cobley
{"title":"Reimagining Semiotics in Communication","authors":"P. Cobley","doi":"10.4324/9781351007924-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Semiotics, in - or as an approach to - communication studies has had mixed fortunes. On the one hand, it has been supposedly superseded by interpretational and more reader-centred research. On the other hand, it has lingered on as a perspective in which signs and texts have been taken as empirical phenomena that demand to be studied regardless, as well as an outlook that comprises nonverbal as well as verbal signification. Yet, in both cases, the kind of semiotics envisaged by communication and media studies is often a throwback to a fashionable heyday when superficial understandings of semiotics were standard in heavily-used textbooks (Fiske 1982; Dyer 1982; Hartley 1982; etc.). The contribution on semiotics for the volume Reimagining Communication will review these traditional perspectives on semiotics localised in communication study but will mainly propose an emerging perspective for the field (Self 2013). In particular, this contribution will outline the ways in which semiotics is a steadfast anti-psychologism characterized by its concern with the suprasubjectivity of the sign relation. It will be shown that this nevertheless comprises cognizance and incorporation of matters central to the communication process: interpretation and the vagaries of context. It will suggest that contemporary semiotics, with its perspective on communication across species and in machines, heralds new vistas for communication study beyond the realms of anthropocentrism.","PeriodicalId":269823,"journal":{"name":"Reimagining Communication: Meaning","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reimagining Communication: Meaning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351007924-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Semiotics, in - or as an approach to - communication studies has had mixed fortunes. On the one hand, it has been supposedly superseded by interpretational and more reader-centred research. On the other hand, it has lingered on as a perspective in which signs and texts have been taken as empirical phenomena that demand to be studied regardless, as well as an outlook that comprises nonverbal as well as verbal signification. Yet, in both cases, the kind of semiotics envisaged by communication and media studies is often a throwback to a fashionable heyday when superficial understandings of semiotics were standard in heavily-used textbooks (Fiske 1982; Dyer 1982; Hartley 1982; etc.). The contribution on semiotics for the volume Reimagining Communication will review these traditional perspectives on semiotics localised in communication study but will mainly propose an emerging perspective for the field (Self 2013). In particular, this contribution will outline the ways in which semiotics is a steadfast anti-psychologism characterized by its concern with the suprasubjectivity of the sign relation. It will be shown that this nevertheless comprises cognizance and incorporation of matters central to the communication process: interpretation and the vagaries of context. It will suggest that contemporary semiotics, with its perspective on communication across species and in machines, heralds new vistas for communication study beyond the realms of anthropocentrism.
重新构想符号学在传播
符号学作为传播学研究的一种方法,其命运好坏参半。一方面,它被认为已经被解释性和更以读者为中心的研究所取代。另一方面,它作为一种观点一直存在,在这种观点中,符号和文本被视为需要不顾一切地进行研究的经验现象,以及一种包括非语言意义和语言意义的观点。然而,在这两种情况下,传播和媒体研究所设想的符号学往往是对时尚鼎盛时期的倒退,当时对符号学的肤浅理解是大量使用的教科书的标准(Fiske 1982;戴尔1982;哈特利1982;等等)。《重塑传播》一书对符号学的贡献将回顾这些传统的符号学在传播研究中的观点,但主要是为该领域提出一个新兴的观点(Self 2013)。特别地,这一贡献将概述符号学是一种坚定的反心理主义的方式,其特点是关注符号关系的超主体性。它将表明,这包括认识和纳入交流过程的核心事项:解释和上下文的变幻莫测。它将表明,当代符号学以其对跨物种和机器交流的看法,预示着超越人类中心主义领域的交流研究的新前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信