HOW DO YOU KNOW IF 85% ACCURACY is good enough for your application?

Matthew Kay, Shwetak N. Patel, J. Kientz
{"title":"HOW DO YOU KNOW IF 85% ACCURACY is good enough for your application?","authors":"Matthew Kay, Shwetak N. Patel, J. Kientz","doi":"10.1145/3131214.3131216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many people who want to build mobile applications based on sensing systems have to decide what type of sensing approaches to use, often trading off factors like accuracy, time, and battery life. If you're building an app that uses location, motion data, or inferred data about usage, there will necessarily be inaccuracy in the output of those systems -- some error that cannot be completely eliminated from the system. In the ubiquitous computing community, there is an unofficial standard that 85% accuracy is \"good enough\" for sensing based on machine learning. But it's not so simple to say that 85% should be your target accuracy to consider a system useful. Maybe 85% accuracy is good enough for an app that helps you identify wasteful appliances so you can conserve water in your home, but is completely unacceptable when three times out of 20 your fall detection app accidentally calls emergency services thinking your loved one has fallen down even though she hasn't.","PeriodicalId":213775,"journal":{"name":"GetMobile Mob. Comput. Commun.","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GetMobile Mob. Comput. Commun.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3131214.3131216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Many people who want to build mobile applications based on sensing systems have to decide what type of sensing approaches to use, often trading off factors like accuracy, time, and battery life. If you're building an app that uses location, motion data, or inferred data about usage, there will necessarily be inaccuracy in the output of those systems -- some error that cannot be completely eliminated from the system. In the ubiquitous computing community, there is an unofficial standard that 85% accuracy is "good enough" for sensing based on machine learning. But it's not so simple to say that 85% should be your target accuracy to consider a system useful. Maybe 85% accuracy is good enough for an app that helps you identify wasteful appliances so you can conserve water in your home, but is completely unacceptable when three times out of 20 your fall detection app accidentally calls emergency services thinking your loved one has fallen down even though she hasn't.
你怎么知道85%的准确率是否足够好?
许多想要基于传感系统构建移动应用程序的人必须决定使用哪种传感方法,通常需要权衡精度、时间和电池寿命等因素。如果你正在构建一个使用位置、运动数据或使用推断数据的应用程序,那么这些系统的输出必然存在不准确性——一些无法从系统中完全消除的错误。在无处不在的计算社区,有一个非官方的标准,85%的准确率对于基于机器学习的传感来说“足够好”。但这并不是简单地说,你的目标准确率应该是85%,才能认为一个系统有用。也许85%的准确率对于一个帮助你识别浪费电器的应用来说已经足够好了,这样你就可以节约家里的水,但是当你的跌倒检测应用20次中有3次不小心打电话给紧急服务,以为你的亲人摔倒了,尽管她没有摔倒,这是完全不可接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信