London in Lockdown: Mobility in the Pandemic City

M. Batty, R. Murcio, Iacopo Iacopini, Maarten Vanhoof, R. Milton
{"title":"London in Lockdown: Mobility in the Pandemic City","authors":"M. Batty, R. Murcio, Iacopo Iacopini, Maarten Vanhoof, R. Milton","doi":"10.1201/9781003181590-21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter looks at the spatial distribution and mobility patterns of essential and non-essential workers before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in London and compares them to the rest of the UK. In the 3-month lockdown that started on 23 March 2020, 20% of the workforce was deemed to be pursuing essential jobs. The other 80%% were either furloughed, which meant being supported by the government to not work, or working from home. Based on travel journey data between zones (trips were decomposed into essential and non-essential trips. Despite some big regional differences within the UK, we find that essential workers have much the same spatial patterning as non-essential for all occupational groups containing essential and non-essential workers. Also, the amount of travel time saved by working from home during the Pandemic is roughly the same proportion -80%-as the separation between essential and non-essential workers. Further, the loss of travel, reduction in workers, reductions in retail spending as well as increases in use of parks are examined in different London boroughs using Google Mobility Reports which give us a clear picture of what has happened over the last 6 months since the first Lockdown. These reports also now imply that a second wave of infection is beginning.","PeriodicalId":162107,"journal":{"name":"COVID-19 Pandemic, Geospatial Information, and Community Resilience","volume":"06 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COVID-19 Pandemic, Geospatial Information, and Community Resilience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003181590-21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

This chapter looks at the spatial distribution and mobility patterns of essential and non-essential workers before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in London and compares them to the rest of the UK. In the 3-month lockdown that started on 23 March 2020, 20% of the workforce was deemed to be pursuing essential jobs. The other 80%% were either furloughed, which meant being supported by the government to not work, or working from home. Based on travel journey data between zones (trips were decomposed into essential and non-essential trips. Despite some big regional differences within the UK, we find that essential workers have much the same spatial patterning as non-essential for all occupational groups containing essential and non-essential workers. Also, the amount of travel time saved by working from home during the Pandemic is roughly the same proportion -80%-as the separation between essential and non-essential workers. Further, the loss of travel, reduction in workers, reductions in retail spending as well as increases in use of parks are examined in different London boroughs using Google Mobility Reports which give us a clear picture of what has happened over the last 6 months since the first Lockdown. These reports also now imply that a second wave of infection is beginning.
封锁中的伦敦:流行病城市的流动性
本章着眼于2019冠状病毒病大流行之前和期间伦敦基本和非基本工人的空间分布和流动模式,并将其与英国其他地区进行比较。在2020年3月23日开始的为期3个月的封锁期间,20%的劳动力被认为在从事必要的工作。另外80%的人要么休假,这意味着政府支持他们不工作,要么在家工作。基于区域间的出行数据,将其分解为必要出行和非必要出行。尽管英国内部存在一些很大的地区差异,但我们发现,对于所有包含必要和非必要工人的职业群体,必要工人的空间格局与非必要工人的空间格局大致相同。此外,大流行期间在家工作节省的旅行时间与必要和非必要工作人员之间的隔离所节省的旅行时间的比例大致相同(80%)。此外,使用谷歌移动报告对伦敦不同行政区的旅行损失、工人减少、零售支出减少以及公园使用增加进行了研究,这让我们清楚地了解了自第一次封锁以来的过去6个月里发生的事情。这些报告现在还暗示,第二波感染正在开始。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信