Motherhood During and After the Holocaust: Testimonial and Fictional Perspectives

H. Duffy
{"title":"Motherhood During and After the Holocaust: Testimonial and Fictional Perspectives","authors":"H. Duffy","doi":"10.1080/25785648.2020.1741856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hitler stated that ‘one gestating Jewish mother posed a greater threat [to Aryan purity] than any fighting man’ and claimed that ‘every child that a [Jewish] woman brings into the world is a battle [...] for the purity of race.’ These pronouncements point to the fact that the Nazis made annihilation of Jewish mothers their strategic objective. However, until recently, mainstream Holocaust historiography paid scant attention to the specificity of the mothers’ experience, instead adopting a gender neutral, not to say male-centered, position. In other words, historians – including some female ones – assumed that men and women experienced Nazi persecution in essentially the same way. Consequently, they ignored significant challenges presented by uniquely feminine experiences, such as menstruation, amenorrhea and the correlated risk of infertility, pregnancy, and childbirth. Jewish women were also exposed to enforced sterilization and abortion, and, whether in ghettos, camps, hiding or resistance groups were often victims of sexual assault. Finally, it was equally as a result of their biological role as child bearers and their socially constructed role as main child carers that Jewish women saw their survival chances drastically reduced. For instance, while in some ghettos, pregnancy was punishable with deportation, arriving in a concentration camp visibly pregnant or accompanied by small children usually meant instant death. For survivors, these experiences caused long-lasting traumas which, in the absence of a context propitious to their articulation, were particularly slow to heal. Even if the specific predicament of Jewish mothers still occupies a relatively small space in historical studies, it has found its way into literature, both testimonial and fictional. The aim of the present special issue of the Journal of Holocaust Research is to explore how mothers have been represented in narratives across languages and cultures. Offering readings of individual texts or favoring a comparative approach, the four articles collated in the present volume address a range of literary texts from a variety of perspectives. They also do so with reference to a wealth of theoretical studies concerning motherhood and, more specifically, the distinctiveness of women’s experience of Nazi persecution. The special issue opens with Carmelle Stephens’s critical examination of two testimonies that have by now achieved canonical status: Olga Lengyel’s Five Chimneys: A Woman","PeriodicalId":422357,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Holocaust Research","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Holocaust Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785648.2020.1741856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Hitler stated that ‘one gestating Jewish mother posed a greater threat [to Aryan purity] than any fighting man’ and claimed that ‘every child that a [Jewish] woman brings into the world is a battle [...] for the purity of race.’ These pronouncements point to the fact that the Nazis made annihilation of Jewish mothers their strategic objective. However, until recently, mainstream Holocaust historiography paid scant attention to the specificity of the mothers’ experience, instead adopting a gender neutral, not to say male-centered, position. In other words, historians – including some female ones – assumed that men and women experienced Nazi persecution in essentially the same way. Consequently, they ignored significant challenges presented by uniquely feminine experiences, such as menstruation, amenorrhea and the correlated risk of infertility, pregnancy, and childbirth. Jewish women were also exposed to enforced sterilization and abortion, and, whether in ghettos, camps, hiding or resistance groups were often victims of sexual assault. Finally, it was equally as a result of their biological role as child bearers and their socially constructed role as main child carers that Jewish women saw their survival chances drastically reduced. For instance, while in some ghettos, pregnancy was punishable with deportation, arriving in a concentration camp visibly pregnant or accompanied by small children usually meant instant death. For survivors, these experiences caused long-lasting traumas which, in the absence of a context propitious to their articulation, were particularly slow to heal. Even if the specific predicament of Jewish mothers still occupies a relatively small space in historical studies, it has found its way into literature, both testimonial and fictional. The aim of the present special issue of the Journal of Holocaust Research is to explore how mothers have been represented in narratives across languages and cultures. Offering readings of individual texts or favoring a comparative approach, the four articles collated in the present volume address a range of literary texts from a variety of perspectives. They also do so with reference to a wealth of theoretical studies concerning motherhood and, more specifically, the distinctiveness of women’s experience of Nazi persecution. The special issue opens with Carmelle Stephens’s critical examination of two testimonies that have by now achieved canonical status: Olga Lengyel’s Five Chimneys: A Woman
大屠杀期间和之后的母性:证言和虚构的观点
希特勒说,“一个怀孕的犹太母亲对(雅利安人的)纯洁性的威胁比任何一个战斗的男人都大”,并声称“一个(犹太)女人带到这个世界上的每一个孩子都是一场战斗……为了种族的纯洁。这些声明表明,纳粹把消灭犹太母亲作为战略目标。然而,直到最近,主流大屠杀史学都很少关注母亲经历的特殊性,而是采取性别中立的立场,更不用说以男性为中心的立场。换句话说,历史学家——包括一些女性历史学家——认为男性和女性经历纳粹迫害的方式基本相同。因此,他们忽视了独特的女性经历所带来的重大挑战,如月经、闭经以及与之相关的不孕、怀孕和分娩风险。犹太妇女还被迫绝育和堕胎,而且,无论是在隔都、营地、藏身处还是抵抗团体,她们往往是性侵犯的受害者。最后,同样由于她们作为生儿育女者的生理角色和作为主要照顾儿童者的社会建构角色,犹太妇女的生存机会急剧减少。例如,在一些隔都,怀孕会受到驱逐出境的惩罚,而明显怀孕或带着小孩进入集中营通常意味着立即死亡。对于幸存者来说,这些经历造成了长期的创伤,在缺乏有利于他们表达的环境下,这种创伤愈合得特别慢。即使犹太母亲的特殊困境在历史研究中仍然占据相对较小的空间,但它已经在文学作品中找到了自己的方式,无论是证明还是虚构。本期《大屠杀研究杂志》特刊的目的是探讨母亲如何在不同语言和文化的叙述中得到体现。提供阅读个别文本或赞成比较的方法,四篇文章整理在本卷地址范围的文学文本从各种角度。他们还参考了大量关于母性的理论研究,更具体地说,妇女遭受纳粹迫害的独特经历。本期特刊以卡梅勒·斯蒂芬斯对两篇如今已获得权威地位的证词的批判性审视开始:奥尔加·伦格尔的《五个烟囱:一个女人》
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信