Fallacies of technological determinism — Lessons for asset management

A. Haider
{"title":"Fallacies of technological determinism — Lessons for asset management","authors":"A. Haider","doi":"10.1109/INFRA.2008.5439667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Engineering asset lifecycle management is information intensive and represents a complex set of activities and processes. These processes generate enormous amount of data, which is captured both electronically and manually, in a variety of formats, shared among an assortment of off the shelf and customized operational and administrative systems, and communicated through a range of sources to an array of business stakeholders. Adoption of information systems for asset management should, therefore, not be treated as technical constructs. In fact, these are social systems, which influence and are influenced by their context. Critical aspects of information systems adoption are to account for organisational culture, social infrastructure, and skills set of employees, and to find the fit between asset lifecycle processes maturity and selected technologies. This paper reports on a case study of a public sector organisation that managing infrastructure assets in one of the largest Australian states. The case indicates that owing to a technologically deterministic view of information system adoption, the promise of an integrated view of asset lifecycle has resulted in a mere historical record of individual activities performed at each stage of lifecycle. The main impediment, among others, has been the fact that technology planning and implementation has been carried out independent of the context, as well as social, organisational, and technical maturity of the organisation.","PeriodicalId":207041,"journal":{"name":"2008 First International Conference on Infrastructure Systems and Services: Building Networks for a Brighter Future (INFRA)","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 First International Conference on Infrastructure Systems and Services: Building Networks for a Brighter Future (INFRA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFRA.2008.5439667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Engineering asset lifecycle management is information intensive and represents a complex set of activities and processes. These processes generate enormous amount of data, which is captured both electronically and manually, in a variety of formats, shared among an assortment of off the shelf and customized operational and administrative systems, and communicated through a range of sources to an array of business stakeholders. Adoption of information systems for asset management should, therefore, not be treated as technical constructs. In fact, these are social systems, which influence and are influenced by their context. Critical aspects of information systems adoption are to account for organisational culture, social infrastructure, and skills set of employees, and to find the fit between asset lifecycle processes maturity and selected technologies. This paper reports on a case study of a public sector organisation that managing infrastructure assets in one of the largest Australian states. The case indicates that owing to a technologically deterministic view of information system adoption, the promise of an integrated view of asset lifecycle has resulted in a mere historical record of individual activities performed at each stage of lifecycle. The main impediment, among others, has been the fact that technology planning and implementation has been carried out independent of the context, as well as social, organisational, and technical maturity of the organisation.
技术决定论的谬误——给资产管理的教训
工程资产生命周期管理是信息密集型的,代表了一组复杂的活动和过程。这些流程产生大量的数据,这些数据以各种格式通过电子和手动方式捕获,在各种现成的和定制的操作和管理系统之间共享,并通过一系列来源与一系列业务利益相关者进行交流。因此,采用信息系统进行资产管理不应被视为技术构想。事实上,这些都是社会系统,它们影响着环境,也受环境的影响。采用信息系统的关键方面是考虑到组织文化、社会基础设施和员工的技能集,并找到资产生命周期过程成熟度和所选技术之间的匹配。本文报告了一个公共部门组织的案例研究,该组织在澳大利亚最大的州之一管理基础设施资产。该案例表明,由于采用信息系统的技术确定性观点,对资产生命周期的综合观点的承诺导致了在生命周期的每个阶段执行的单个活动的仅仅历史记录。其中的主要障碍是,技术规划和实现是独立于环境,以及组织的社会、组织和技术成熟度而进行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信