Comparative Evaluation of Assessment Activities in an Introductory Occupational Safety and Health Course

Erwin B. Daculan
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Assessment Activities in an Introductory Occupational Safety and Health Course","authors":"Erwin B. Daculan","doi":"10.1109/TENCON50793.2020.9293851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper emerged during the process of continuous quality improvement of an introductory course on occupational safety and health. Did the students correctly associate an assessment activity to the right course outcome? The paper compared the evaluation of the students and the facilitator on the different activities used to assess the demonstration of abilities/outcomes attributed with the course. There were two activities per quarter of the semester. Each activity had been scheduled to demonstrate specific outcome indicators by the facilitator and is described in detail. An evaluation questionnaire was provided at the end of the semester to ascertain whether the students assessed the same outcome indicator as what course the set for each activity. The contention was to harmonize what outcomes the students believed they are exhibiting and what outcomes the course had intended for such activity. The gathered data from the evaluation questionnaire were tabulated and then compared with the original intended outcomes by the facilitator. Interpretation of the data was also forwarded and the path for continuous quality improvement was drawn.","PeriodicalId":283131,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE REGION 10 CONFERENCE (TENCON)","volume":"224 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE REGION 10 CONFERENCE (TENCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TENCON50793.2020.9293851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper emerged during the process of continuous quality improvement of an introductory course on occupational safety and health. Did the students correctly associate an assessment activity to the right course outcome? The paper compared the evaluation of the students and the facilitator on the different activities used to assess the demonstration of abilities/outcomes attributed with the course. There were two activities per quarter of the semester. Each activity had been scheduled to demonstrate specific outcome indicators by the facilitator and is described in detail. An evaluation questionnaire was provided at the end of the semester to ascertain whether the students assessed the same outcome indicator as what course the set for each activity. The contention was to harmonize what outcomes the students believed they are exhibiting and what outcomes the course had intended for such activity. The gathered data from the evaluation questionnaire were tabulated and then compared with the original intended outcomes by the facilitator. Interpretation of the data was also forwarded and the path for continuous quality improvement was drawn.
职业安全与健康导论课程评鉴活动之比较评估
本文是在职业安全卫生导论课程质量不断提高的过程中产生的。学生是否正确地将评估活动与正确的课程结果联系起来?本文比较了学生和引导者对不同活动的评价,这些活动用于评估与课程相关的能力/结果的展示。本学期每季度有两次活动。每项活动的安排都是由调解人演示具体的结果指标,并详细说明。在学期结束时提供了一份评估问卷,以确定学生评估的结果指标是否与为每项活动设置的课程相同。争论的焦点是协调学生认为他们展示的结果和课程对这种活动的预期结果。从评估问卷中收集的数据被制成表格,然后由调解人与最初的预期结果进行比较。并对数据进行了解读,提出了持续质量改进的路径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信