Gender Differences in Preferences and Proclivities for ICT Tools and Online Services

Winfred Yaokumah, Fred Totimeh, Peace Kumah
{"title":"Gender Differences in Preferences and Proclivities for ICT Tools and Online Services","authors":"Winfred Yaokumah, Fred Totimeh, Peace Kumah","doi":"10.4018/978-1-5225-7068-4.CH005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gender essentialism is often used to excuse gender-based biases in the use of ICT tools and online services encouraging gender inequalities in opportunities for both males and females. This chapter aims at exploring ICT tools and online services currently being used by university students. The chapter investigates gender differences in preferences and proclivities for ICT tools and online services. Data collected from 618 university students were analyzed. The results show that males significantly differ in the use and preferences of ICT tools and devices (smart phones and tablets) from females. Conversely, females significantly differ in the use and preferences for online services (WhatsApp, text messaging, and library search engines) from males. The study also finds that smartphone and laptop computers are the most frequently used ICT tools and WhatsApp and Facebook are the most preferred online services. Gender studies in ICT to understand gender differences and proclivities are importance for policy direction towards an effort to bridge the gender gap.","PeriodicalId":306643,"journal":{"name":"Gender Gaps and the Social Inclusion Movement in ICT","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender Gaps and the Social Inclusion Movement in ICT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7068-4.CH005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gender essentialism is often used to excuse gender-based biases in the use of ICT tools and online services encouraging gender inequalities in opportunities for both males and females. This chapter aims at exploring ICT tools and online services currently being used by university students. The chapter investigates gender differences in preferences and proclivities for ICT tools and online services. Data collected from 618 university students were analyzed. The results show that males significantly differ in the use and preferences of ICT tools and devices (smart phones and tablets) from females. Conversely, females significantly differ in the use and preferences for online services (WhatsApp, text messaging, and library search engines) from males. The study also finds that smartphone and laptop computers are the most frequently used ICT tools and WhatsApp and Facebook are the most preferred online services. Gender studies in ICT to understand gender differences and proclivities are importance for policy direction towards an effort to bridge the gender gap.
信息通信技术工具和在线服务的偏好和倾向的性别差异
性别本质主义经常被用来为使用信息通信技术工具和在线服务时的性别偏见辩解,这些偏见鼓励男女在机会方面的性别不平等。本章旨在探讨目前大学生正在使用的ICT工具和在线服务。本章调查了对信息通信技术工具和在线服务的偏好和倾向的性别差异。对618名大学生收集的数据进行了分析。结果显示,男性在使用和偏好ICT工具和设备(智能手机和平板电脑)方面与女性存在显著差异。相反,女性在使用和偏好在线服务(WhatsApp、短信和图书馆搜索引擎)方面与男性有显著差异。研究还发现,智能手机和笔记本电脑是最常用的信息通信技术工具,WhatsApp和Facebook是最受欢迎的在线服务。在信息和通信技术中进行性别研究,了解性别差异和倾向,这对于制定旨在缩小性别差距的政策具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信