Larger-than-memory data management on modern storage hardware for in-memory OLTP database systems

Lin Ma, Joy Arulraj, Sam Zhao, Andrew Pavlo, Subramanya R. Dulloor, Michael J. Giardino, Jeff Parkhurst, J. L. Gardner, K. Doshi, S. Zdonik
{"title":"Larger-than-memory data management on modern storage hardware for in-memory OLTP database systems","authors":"Lin Ma, Joy Arulraj, Sam Zhao, Andrew Pavlo, Subramanya R. Dulloor, Michael J. Giardino, Jeff Parkhurst, J. L. Gardner, K. Doshi, S. Zdonik","doi":"10.1145/2933349.2933358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In-memory database management systems (DBMSs) outperform disk-oriented systems for on-line transaction processing (OLTP) workloads. But this improved performance is only achievable when the database is smaller than the amount of physical memory available in the system. To overcome this limitation, some in-memory DBMSs can move cold data out of volatile DRAM to secondary storage. Such data appears as if it resides in memory with the rest of the database even though it does not.\n Although there have been several implementations proposed for this type of cold data storage, there has not been a thorough evaluation of the design decisions in implementing this technique, such as policies for when to evict tuples and how to bring them back when they are needed. These choices are further complicated by the varying performance characteristics of different storage devices, including future non-volatile memory technologies. We explore these issues in this paper and discuss several approaches to solve them. We implemented all of these approaches in an in-memory DBMS and evaluated them using five different storage technologies. Our results show that choosing the best strategy based on the hardware improves throughput by 92-340% over a generic configuration.","PeriodicalId":298901,"journal":{"name":"International Workshop on Data Management on New Hardware","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Workshop on Data Management on New Hardware","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2933349.2933358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

In-memory database management systems (DBMSs) outperform disk-oriented systems for on-line transaction processing (OLTP) workloads. But this improved performance is only achievable when the database is smaller than the amount of physical memory available in the system. To overcome this limitation, some in-memory DBMSs can move cold data out of volatile DRAM to secondary storage. Such data appears as if it resides in memory with the rest of the database even though it does not. Although there have been several implementations proposed for this type of cold data storage, there has not been a thorough evaluation of the design decisions in implementing this technique, such as policies for when to evict tuples and how to bring them back when they are needed. These choices are further complicated by the varying performance characteristics of different storage devices, including future non-volatile memory technologies. We explore these issues in this paper and discuss several approaches to solve them. We implemented all of these approaches in an in-memory DBMS and evaluated them using five different storage technologies. Our results show that choosing the best strategy based on the hardware improves throughput by 92-340% over a generic configuration.
用于内存OLTP数据库系统的现代存储硬件上的大于内存的数据管理
内存数据库管理系统(dbms)在联机事务处理(OLTP)工作负载方面优于面向磁盘的系统。但是,只有当数据库小于系统中可用的物理内存量时,才能实现这种改进的性能。为了克服这个限制,一些内存中的dbms可以将冷数据从易失性DRAM移到辅助存储中。这些数据看起来好像与数据库的其余部分一起驻留在内存中,尽管事实并非如此。尽管已经针对这种类型的冷数据存储提出了几种实现,但是还没有对实现这种技术的设计决策进行彻底的评估,例如何时驱逐元组以及如何在需要时将它们带回来的策略。由于不同存储设备(包括未来的非易失性存储技术)的不同性能特征,这些选择变得更加复杂。我们在本文中探讨了这些问题,并讨论了解决这些问题的几种方法。我们在一个内存DBMS中实现了所有这些方法,并使用五种不同的存储技术对它们进行了评估。我们的结果表明,选择基于硬件的最佳策略比通用配置提高了92-340%的吞吐量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信