The Aborigines' Protection Society as an Anticolonial Network: Rethinking the APS "from the bottom up" through letters written by Black South Africans, 1883–87

Darren R. Reid
{"title":"The Aborigines' Protection Society as an Anticolonial Network: Rethinking the APS \"from the bottom up\" through letters written by Black South Africans, 1883–87","authors":"Darren R. Reid","doi":"10.1353/cch.2021.0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Histories of the Aborigines' Protection Society (APS) often take for granted that the APS was principally a metropolitan organization, existing primarily in the minds and actions of its members in London. This paper presents a new perspective, highlighting that the APS also existed in the minds and the actions of its global network of settler, missionary, traveller and Indigenous correspondents that provided the APS with information on the conditions of the imperial peripheries. Case studies of letters written by three Black South Africans—John Tengo Jabavu, Mqikela, and Samuel Moroka—to the APS between 1883 and 1887 are examined. Jabavu wrote from Cape Town, challenging Cape encroachments on African voting rights. Mqikela wrote from Pondoland, challenging Cape encroachments on Mpondo territory. Samuel Moroka wrote while visiting London, challenging Orange Free State interference in his succession dispute in Thaba Nchu. Placing these letters within a framework of epistolary mobility, this paper demonstrates how the correspondents used writing to the APS as a tool of anticolonial resistance. More than simply \"attempting\" resistance, Jabavu, Mqikela, and Samuel Moroka occasionally succeeded in their attempts, convincing the APS to raise their questions in the House of Commons, set up interviews between them and Members of Parliament, and publish their articles in daily newspapers. Yet these successes were always conditioned by an unequal balance of power. The APS could censor and control the voices of Jabavu, Mqikela, and Samuel Moroka when assisting them was no longer in the APS's interest. Approaching the APS from the perspectives of Black South African correspondents offers a new perspective not only on the APS as an anticolonial network, but also on colony-metropole relationships in late nineteenth-century South Africa.","PeriodicalId":278323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Colonialism and Colonial History","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Colonialism and Colonial History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cch.2021.0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Histories of the Aborigines' Protection Society (APS) often take for granted that the APS was principally a metropolitan organization, existing primarily in the minds and actions of its members in London. This paper presents a new perspective, highlighting that the APS also existed in the minds and the actions of its global network of settler, missionary, traveller and Indigenous correspondents that provided the APS with information on the conditions of the imperial peripheries. Case studies of letters written by three Black South Africans—John Tengo Jabavu, Mqikela, and Samuel Moroka—to the APS between 1883 and 1887 are examined. Jabavu wrote from Cape Town, challenging Cape encroachments on African voting rights. Mqikela wrote from Pondoland, challenging Cape encroachments on Mpondo territory. Samuel Moroka wrote while visiting London, challenging Orange Free State interference in his succession dispute in Thaba Nchu. Placing these letters within a framework of epistolary mobility, this paper demonstrates how the correspondents used writing to the APS as a tool of anticolonial resistance. More than simply "attempting" resistance, Jabavu, Mqikela, and Samuel Moroka occasionally succeeded in their attempts, convincing the APS to raise their questions in the House of Commons, set up interviews between them and Members of Parliament, and publish their articles in daily newspapers. Yet these successes were always conditioned by an unequal balance of power. The APS could censor and control the voices of Jabavu, Mqikela, and Samuel Moroka when assisting them was no longer in the APS's interest. Approaching the APS from the perspectives of Black South African correspondents offers a new perspective not only on the APS as an anticolonial network, but also on colony-metropole relationships in late nineteenth-century South Africa.
作为反殖民网络的原住民保护协会:通过1883-87年南非黑人的信件“自下而上”反思APS
摘要:在《原住民保护协会的历史》一书中,人们常常想当然地认为,原住民保护协会主要是一个大都市组织,主要存在于其伦敦成员的思想和行动中。本文提出了一种新的观点,强调APS也存在于其全球网络的定居者,传教士,旅行者和土著通讯员的思想和行动中,这些网络为APS提供了有关帝国边缘状况的信息。本文对三位南非黑人——john Tengo Jabavu, Mqikela和Samuel moroka——在1883年至1887年间写给APS的信件进行了个案研究。Jabavu在开普敦撰文,挑战开普敦对非洲投票权的侵犯。Mqikela从庞多兰写信,挑战开普对庞多领土的侵占。萨缪尔·莫洛卡在访问伦敦时写道,挑战橙色自由邦干涉他在塔巴恩州的继承纠纷。本文将这些信件置于书信流动的框架内,展示了通讯员如何将写信给APS作为反殖民抵抗的工具。贾巴武、姆奇克拉和塞缪尔·莫洛卡不仅仅是“尝试”抵抗,他们的尝试偶尔也会成功,说服APS在下议院提出他们的问题,安排他们与国会议员的访谈,并在日报上发表他们的文章。然而,这些成功总是以不平等的权力平衡为条件。当协助贾巴武、姆奇克拉和塞缪尔·莫洛卡不再符合APS的利益时,APS可以审查和控制他们的声音。从南非黑人记者的角度来研究APS,不仅为APS作为一个反殖民网络提供了一个新的视角,而且还为19世纪后期南非的殖民地-大都市关系提供了一个新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信